Ultra-long acting insulin-fc fusion protein and methods of use

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure relates to compositions of insulin-Fc fusion proteins and their use to treat feline diabetes.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 17/226,847, filed Apr. 9, 2021, which claims the prioritybenefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/008,520,filed Apr. 10, 2020. The contents of the aforementioned patentapplications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in theirentirety.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The following application contains a sequence listing presenting inaccordance with 37 C.R.F. 1.822. The sequence listing is entitled“SequenceListing031” submitted as an ASCII computer readable text filecreated on Nov. 4, 2021, as 65,564 bytes, which is incorporated byreference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present technology relates to compositions of insulin-Fc fusionproteins and their use to treat diabetes in companion animals, e.g.,cats.

BACKGROUND

The following description of the background of the present technology isprovided simply as an aid in understanding the present technology and isnot admitted to describe or constitute prior art to the presenttechnology.

Diabetes is a chronic condition characterized by an insulin deficiencyand/or ineffective use of insulin. Diabetics that have an absolutedeficiency of insulin are categorized as having type 1 orinsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Type 1 diabetics are thoughtto have a genetic predisposition combined with immunologic destructionof the insulin-producing β-cells of the pancreas. In comparison,diabetics that have the capability to still produce some insulin buthave a relative deficiency due to insulin resistance or otherdysfunction, are classified as having type 2 or non-insulin-dependentdiabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Type 2 increased insulin production orincreased insulin resistance is linked to genetic predisposition,obesity, and certain medications.

When a cat does not produce insulin or cannot use it normally, the cat'sblood sugar levels elevate, resulting in hyperglycemia. Diabetic catscan fall under the type 1 (IDDM) or type 2 (NIDDM) classification.Generally, cats initially develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (insulinresistance), but by the time the disease is usually diagnosed by aveterinarian, it has progressed to type 1 (inflammatory disease inpancreas with significant loss of beta cell mass), and the cat isdependent on exogenous insulin. Some diabetic cats can be managed withdietary changes and oral medication, but the majority of diabetic catsneed to receive insulin to maintain adequate regulation. Left untreated,it can lead to weight loss, loss of appetite, vomiting, dehydration,problems with motor function, coma, and even death. Cats that fall underthe type 1 classification need daily shots to replace the missinginsulin, but cats falling under the type 2 classification also stand tobenefit from improved glycemic control through administration ofadditional exogenous insulin to help overcome their resistance toinsulin.

Approximately 0.5% of cats in the United States have diabetes. Currentdiabetes therapies for cats include the use of insulin, such as ProZinc®(Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Duluth, Ga.) which is administered onceor twice daily. The burden of frequent injections on owners oftenresults in a lack of treatment regimen compliance and under dosing,leading to poor long-term health outcomes. In fact, the significantcosts of insulin therapy and the practicality of dosing their pets up to14 times per week leads to a significant percentage of owners to selecteuthanasia for their pets as an alternative to intensive management ofdiabetes. Therefore, there is a need for cost effective and lessburdensome treatment options for this disease.

SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT TECHNOLOGY

In an aspect, the present disclosure provides a fusion proteincomprising an insulin polypeptide and an Fc fragment, wherein theinsulin polypeptide and the Fc fragment are connected by a linker suchas a peptide linker, wherein the Fc fragment comprises the sequence:

(SEQ ID NO: 21) GEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG.

In one embodiment, the present disclosure provides a fusion proteincomprising an insulin polypeptide and an Fc fragment, wherein theinsulin polypeptide and the Fc fragment are connected by a linker (e.g.,peptide linker) comprising the sequence GGGGSGGGG (SEQ ID NO: 10).

In an embodiment, the present disclosure provides for a fusion proteincomprising an insulin polypeptide and an Fc fragment, wherein theinsulin polypeptide and the Fc fragment are connected by a linker (e.g.,peptide linker), and wherein the fusion protein comprises the sequence

(SEQ ID NO: 36) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG.

In embodiments, a fusion protein of the present disclosure comprises adimer, wherein the dimer comprises two identical monomers bound togethervia disulfide bonds e.g., the fusion protein is a homodimer. Inembodiments, the percentage homodimer of insulin-Fc fusion protein isgreater than or equal to 90%.

In embodiments, the fusion proteins described herein are made usingHEK293 cells, and the resulting homodimer titer after purification usingProtein A beads or a Protein A column is greater than 40 mg/L. Inembodiments, the insulin receptor IC50 for the fusion proteins describedherein is less than or equal to 5000 nM. In embodiments, the serumhalf-life of the fusion proteins described herein in the blood or serumof a target animal upon administration is longer than about 3 days. Forthe fusion proteins described herein, the time during which there is astatistically significant decrease in blood glucose level in a subjectrelative to a pre-dose level is longer than one of 2 hours, 6 hours, 9hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 1 day, 1.5 days, 2 days, 2.5 days, 3 days, 4days, 5 days, 6 days, 7 days or longer.

In aspects, for the fusion proteins described herein, the NAOC after thefirst subcutaneous injection at a dose between 0.025 and 0.5 mg/kg/weekin a target animal is greater than 150% FBGL·days·kg/mg. In embodiments,for the fusion proteins described herein, the ratio of the NAOC afterthe third weekly subcutaneous injection of the fusion proteins in thetarget animal to the NAOC after the first subcutaneous injection of thefusion protein in the target animal is greater than 0.50.

In aspects, fusion proteins as described herein are formulated as apharmaceutical composition. In embodiments, in the pharmaceuticalcomposition the fusion protein is present at a concentration of about 3mg/mL or greater. In embodiments, the composition is suitable forsubcutaneous administration.

In aspects, a method is described for lowering the blood glucose levelof a cat, the method comprising administering a physiologicallyeffective amount of a fusion protein as described herein or apharmaceutical composition thereof to the cat. In embodiments, the catis diagnosed with diabetes. In some embodiments, the fusion protein isadministered subcutaneously. In some embodiments, the fusion protein isadministered daily, twice weekly, or once weekly to the cat. Inexamples, the fusion protein is administered once weekly to the cat at adose between 0.025 and 0.5 mg/kg/week. In aspects, a cell engineered toexpress a fusion protein as described herein. In examples, the cell istransfected with a nucleic acid encoding the fusion protein. Inexamples, the cell is a HEK293 cell or a CHO cell.

In an aspect, a cDNA encoding a fusion protein as described herein isdescribed. In embodiments, the cDNA comprises the nucleic acid sequenceencoding the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 36 where the leadersequence is in bold:

(SEQ ID NO: 37) ATGGAATGGAGCTGGGTCTTTCTCTTCTTCCTGTCAGTAACGACTGGTGTCCACTCCTTCGTGAACCAGCACCTGTGCGGCTCCGACCTGGTGGAAGCTCTGTATCTCGTGTGCGGCGAGCGGGGCTTCTTCTACACCGATCCCACTGGAGGCGGTCCACGCAGAGGCATCGTGGAACAGTGCTGCCACTCCATCTGCTCCCTGTACCAGCTGGAAAACTACTGCAATGGCGGAGGTGGTTCAGGAGGCGGTGGAGGTGAGGGCCCCAAGTGCCCCGTGCCCGAGATTCCCGGTGCCCCCAGCGTGTTCATCTTTCCCCCAAAACCCAAGGACACCCTGAGCATCAGCAGGACCCCCGAGGTGACCTGCCTGGTGGTGGACCTGGGACCCGACGACAGCAACGTGCAGATCACCTGGTTCGTGGACAACACCGAGATGCACACCGCCAAGACCAGGCCTCGGGAGGAGCAGTTCAAGAGCACCTACAGGGTGGTGAGCGTGCTGCCCATCCTGCACCAGGACTGGCTGAAGGGCAAGGAGTTCAAGTGCAAGGTGAACAGCAAGAGCCTGCCCAGCGCCATGGAGAGGACCATCAGCAAGGCCAAGGGTCAGCCCCACGAGCCCCAAGTGTACGTGCTTCCCCCGACCCAGGAGGAGTTGAGCGAGAACAAAGTGAGCGTGACCTGCCTGATCAAGGGCTTCCACCCTCCCGACATCGCCGTGGAGTGGGAGATCACCGGCCAGCCTGAGCCGGAAAATAACTACCAGACCACCCCTCCACAGCTGGACAGCGACGGCACCTACTTCCTTTACAGCAGGCTGTCTGTGGACCGAAGCCATTGGCAAAGGGGCAACACCTACACCTGCAGCGTGAGCCACGAGGCTCTGCACAGCCACCACACCCAGAAGTCTCTGACCCAGAGCCCCGGATAG.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of an exemplary insulin-Fcfusion protein homodimer.

FIG. 2 shows average % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 3for N=3 dogs dosed intravenously on Day 0 at 0.2 mg/kg with thehomodimer of SEQ ID NO: 22.

FIG. 3 illustrates a side-by-side sequence comparison of SEQ ID NO: 22,SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24 and SEQ ID NO: 25. “*” represents completehomology across all sequences at a given sequence position, while “:”,“.” or spaces refer to conservative, moderate, or very different aminoacid mutations across the sequences at a given sequence position,respectively.

FIG. 4 illustrates a side-by-side sequence comparison of SEQ ID NO: 32,SEQ ID NO: 34, and SEQ ID NO: 36. “*” represents complete homologyacross all sequences at a given sequence position, while “:”, “.” orspaces refer to conservative, moderate, or very different amino acidmutations across the sequences at a given sequence position,respectively.

FIG. 5 shows average % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 7for N=3 dogs dosed intravenously on Day 0 at 0.2 mg/kg with thehomodimer of SEQ ID NO: 26.

FIG. 6 shows average % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 7for N=6 dogs dosed subcutaneously on Day 0 at 0.33 mg/kg with thehomodimer of SEQ ID NO: 26.

FIG. 7 shows the average anti-drug antibody titer (μg/mL) for N=3 dogsdosed subcutaneously on Day 0 (0.30 mg/kg), Day 28 (0.33 mg/kg), Day 35(0.33 mg/kg), Day 42 (0.50 mg/kg), Day 49 (1.00 mg/kg) and Day 56 (1.00mg/kg) with the homodimer of SEQ ID NO: 26.

FIG. 8 shows % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 21 for N=1dog dosed subcutaneously on Day 0 and Day 14 with the homodimer of SEQID NO: 26.

FIG. 9 shows % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 35 for N=1dog dosed subcutaneously on Day 0, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28 with thehomodimer of SEQ ID NO: 29.

FIG. 10 shows % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 21 forN=1 dog dosed subcutaneously on Day 0 and Day 14 with the homodimer ofSEQ ID NO: 30.

FIG. 11 shows % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 21 forN=1 dog dosed subcutaneously on Day 0, Day 7 and Day 14 with thehomodimer of SEQ ID NO: 31.

FIG. 12 shows average % fasting blood glucose levels from Day 0 to Day 7for a cat dosed with the homodimer of SEQ ID NO: 32.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An insulin treatment that requires less frequent dosing (e.g.,once-weekly injections) would be less burdensome on the owners, leadingto better compliance, fewer instances of euthanasia, and better outcomesfor the pets. As disclosed herein, proposed ultra-long acting insulintreatments for veterinary clinical use comprise an insulin-Fc fusionprotein making use of an Fc fragment to prolong their action in vivo. Aninsulin-Fc fusion protein suitable for an ultra-long acting treatmentfor diabetes should meet various design goals. An insulin-Fc fusionprotein configuration suitable for an ultra-long acting treatment fordiabetes in cats should be manufacturable in mammalian cells, forexample human embryonic kidney (HEK, e.g., HEK293) cells, with anacceptable titer of the desired homodimer product (e.g., greater than 40mg/L homodimer titer from transiently transfected HEK cells, greaterthan 75 mg/L from transiently transfected HEK cells, greater than 100mg/L from transiently transfected HEK cells, etc.). Only candidates witha homodimer titer of greater than 40 mg/L from transiently transfectedHEK cells are considered useful in the present invention, becauseexperience has demonstrated that homodimer titers less than this levelwill not likely result in commercial production homodimer titers inChinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells that meet the stringently lowmanufacturing cost requirements for veterinary products.

In addition, the molecule must bind the insulin receptor with anappreciable affinity (e.g., IC50 less than 5000 nM, IC50 less than 4000nM, IC50 less than 3000 nM, IC50 less than 2500 nM, etc.) as measured inthe 4° C. IM-9 insulin receptor binding assay. Based on experience, onlymolecules exhibiting insulin receptor activity IC50 values less than5000 nM are deemed likely to exhibit the requisite bioactivity in thetarget species. The molecule must also demonstrate sustained bioactivityin vivo (e.g., demonstrate glucose lowering activity greater than about2 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 1 day, 1.5 days, 2 days,2.5 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days, 7 days, or longer) to justifyless frequent dosing. The molecule must also demonstrate prolongedsystem residence time in the target animal (e.g., the serum half-lifemust be greater than 3 days, or longer). The bioactive potency andduration of the bioactivity may be quantitatively represented bycalculating the area over the percent fasting blood glucose (% FBGL)curve normalized to a given dose in mg/kg (NAOC) with units of %FBGL·days·kg/mg as described in Example 15. The NAOC increases with agreater drop in % FBGL, which is the case where the moleculedemonstrates increased bioactivity, and when the % FBGL takes longer toreturn to 100%, which is the case where the insulin-Fc fusion proteindemonstrates increased duration of action. To be useful as describedherein, a molecule must demonstrate a sufficiently high NAOC value(e.g., preferably NAOC greater than 150% FBGL·days·kg/mg, morepreferably NAOC greater than 200% FBGL·days·kg/mg, and even morepreferably NAOC greater than 250% FBGL·days·kg/mg). Based on experience,at NAOC values greater than 150% FBGL·days·kg/mg, the dose requirementsin the target species will be sufficiently low to reach an acceptabletreatment cost.

There are insulin-Fc fusion proteins known that make use of a human Fcregion to prolong their action in vivo. However, insulin-Fc fusionproteins with a human Fc, when used in cats, develop antibodies thatneutralize their action. Replacing a human Fc with a feline IgG Fcisotype would help to prevent unwanted immunogenicity which could resultin the creation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies.

There are three feline Fc isotypes: IgG1a (SEQ ID NO: 17), IgG1b (SEQ IDNO: 18), and IgG2 (SEQ ID NO: 19) as shown below.

(SEQ ID NO: 17) DCPKCPPPEMLGGPSIFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSDVQITWFVDNTQVYTAKTSPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSPIERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPAQEELSRNKVSVTCLIKSFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYRTTPPQLDSDGTYFVYSKLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG (SEQ ID NO: 18)DCPKCPPPEMLGGPSIFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSDVQITWFVDNTQVYTAKTSPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSPIERTISKDKGQPHEPQVYVLPPAQEELSRNKVSVTCLIEGFYPSDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYRTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSRWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG (SEQ ID NO: 19)GEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG

Replacing the human Fc fragment of an insulin-Fc fusion protein with afeline IgG2 isotype would be most preferable due to its lack ofFc(gamma) effector function in felines (much like the human IgG2isotype).

A feline insulin-Fc fusion protein may comprise an insulin analogpolypeptide as shown in SEQ ID NO: 4 with mutations on the B-chain andA-chain and comprising a C-chain of SEQ ID NO: 8.

(SEQ ID NO: 8) GGGPRR (SEQ ID NO: 4) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCN

The insulin analog polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 4 is connected via apeptide linker of SEQ ID NO: 10 to a feline IgG2 Fc fragment of SEQ IDNO: 19.

(SEQ ID NO: 10) GGGGSGGGG (SEQ ID NO: 19)GEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG

The resulting feline insulin-Fc fusion protein is shown below in SEQ IDNO: 32.

(SEQ ID NO: 32) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG

The feline insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 32 illustratesacceptable in vivo bioactivity in cats when administered subcutaneously,as is shown in FIG. 12. However, after several weekly treatments of SEQID NO: 32, the cats showed an immune response to the treatment. It wasdiscovered that the cats had generated antibodies which wereneutralizing to the action of the treatment in vivo. Further analysisrevealed that these antibodies were targeting the insulin polypeptide atpositions where amino acids had been mutated from natural insulin. Morespecifically, the amino acid at position 10 on the insulin B-chain hadbeen mutated from His to Asp, and the amino acid at position 8 on theinsulin A-chain had been mutated from Thr to His.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed thatnon-glycosylated insulin Fc-fusion proteins are less immunogenic thantheir counterpart insulin-Fc fusion proteins that are left in theirnatural glycosylated state. Although the antibodies generated inresponse to treatment with SEQ ID NO: 32 were targeted at the insulinpolypeptide, producing a non-glycosylated insulin-Fc fusion protein wasconsidered to have the potential to reduce the immunogenicity profileoverall. It is known that mutating the Fc fragment at the naturalglycosylation site found at position 140 from the N-terminus willprevent glycosylation of the molecule during expression from mammaliancells. It was therefore expected that a mutation from asparagine toserine at the natural glycan site found at position 140 from theN-terminus of the insulin Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 32 (resultingin SEQ ID NO: 34) while retaining the same insulin polypeptide andpeptide linker, would result in an insulin-Fc fusion protein thatretains acceptable in vivo bioactivity in cats when administeredsubcutaneously, but which has a significantly reduced immune responsewhen repeatedly dosed.

The feline Fc fragment with the mutation from asparagine to serine atthe natural glycan site is given in SEQ ID NO: 20.

(SEQ ID NO: 20) GEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFSSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG (SEQ ID NO: 34)FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFSSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG

An analogous compound for canines comprises the insulin polypeptide ofSEQ ID NO: 5 and linker of SEQ ID NO: 9 with the native canine IgGBfragment of SEQ ID NO: 12.

(SEQ ID NO: 12) DCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFNGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG

The resulting canine insulin-Fc fusion protein is given below in SEQ IDNO: 26.

(SEQ ID NO: 26) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGDCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFNGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQ ESLSHSPG

If the natural glycan site found at the cNg position of SEQ ID NO: 26has the asparagine to serine mutation, the resulting canine insulin-Fcfusion protein is SEQ ID NO: 29. This compound for canines comprises thesame insulin polypeptides of SEQ ID NO: 5 and linker of SEQ ID NO: 9with the canine IgGB fragment of SEQ ID NO: 15 (which has an asparagineto serine mutation at the natural glycan site found at the cNgposition).

(SEQ ID NO: 15) DCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFSGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG

The resulting canine insulin-Fc fusion protein is given below in SEQ IDNO: 29.

(SEQ ID NO: 29) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGDCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFSGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQ ESLSHSPG

The insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 29 shows acceptable in vivobioactivity in dogs when administered subcutaneously but continues togenerate antibodies targeting the insulin polypeptide after a few weeklytreatments. This change from asparagine to serine at the N glycosylationsite of the Fc fragment (cNg) to decrease its immunogenic potential didnot eliminate the immune response that is targeted to the mutatedportions of the insulin polypeptide.

Unexpectedly, it has been shown that a canine insulin-Fc fusion protein(SEQ ID NO: 31 below) with the same insulin polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 5)and linker (SEQ ID NO: 9) and canine IgGB fragment but with a differentmutation at the N glycosylation site of the Fc fragment (cNg) (e.g.,asparagine to lysine) and the aspartic acid from the hinge region of theFc fragment removed shows acceptable in vivo bioactivity in dogs whenadministered subcutaneously and does not generate antibodies even afterseveral weekly treatments.

The canine IgGB fragment with an asparagine to lysine mutation at the Nglycosylation site of the Fc fragment (cNg) and the aspartic acid fromthe hinge region of the Fc fragment removed is given in SEQ ID NO: 16.

(SEQ ID NO: 16) CPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFKGYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG

The resulting canine insulin-Fc fusion protein is given in SEQ ID NO:31.

(SEQ ID NO: 31) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFKGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQE SLSHSPG

It is therefore expected that a mutation from asparagine to lysine atthe natural glycan site found at position 140 from the N-terminus in theanalogous compound for cats (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 32 which is the compoundwith the same insulin polypeptide and feline IgG2 fragment which wasshown to be immunogenic), i.e., mutating SEQ ID NO: 32 resulting in SEQID NO: 36, will similarly result in an insulin-Fc fusion protein withacceptable in vivo bioactivity in cats when administered subcutaneously,and which does not generate antibodies even after several weeklytreatments.

(SEQ ID NO: 36) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG.

Definitions

As used herein, the articles “a” and “an” refer to one or more than one,e.g., to at least one of the grammatical object of the article. The useof the words “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term“comprising” herein may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with themeaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.”

As used herein, “about” and “approximately” generally mean an acceptabledegree of error for the quantity measured given the nature or precisionof the measurements. Exemplary degrees of error are within 20 percent(%), typically, within 10%, and more typically, within 5% of a givenrange of values.

As used herein, an amount of a molecule, compound, conjugate, orsubstance effective to treat a disorder (e.g., a disorder describedherein), “therapeutically effective amount,” or “effective amount”refers to an amount of the molecule, compound, conjugate, or substancewhich is effective, upon single or multiple dose administration(s) to asubject, in treating a subject, or in curing, alleviating, relieving orimproving a subject with a disorder (e.g., a disorder described herein)beyond that expected in the absence of such treatment.

As used herein, the term “analog” refers to a compound or conjugate(e.g., a compound or conjugate as described herein, e.g., insulin)having a chemical structure like that of another compound or conjugatebut differing from it in at least one aspect.

As used herein, the term “antibody” or “antibody molecule” refers to animmunoglobulin molecule (Ig), immunologically active portions of animmunoglobulin (Ig) molecule, i.e., a molecule that contains an antigenbinding site that specifically binds, e.g., immunoreacts with, anantigen. As used herein, the term “antibody domain” refers to a variableor constant region of an immunoglobulin. It is documented in the artthat antibodies comprise several classes, for example IgA, IgM, or IgGin the case of mammals (e.g., felines). Classes of immunoglobulins canbe further classified into different isotypes such as IgG1, IgG2, andIgG3, etc., or in other instances IgG1a, IgG1b, and IgG2. Those skilledin the art will recognize that immunoglobulin isotypes of a givenimmunoglobulin class will comprise different amino acid sequences,structures, and functional properties from one another (e.g., differentbinding affinities to Fc(gamma) receptors). “Specifically binds” or“immunoreacts with” means that the antibody reacts with one or moreantigenic determinants of the desired antigen and has a lower affinityfor other polypeptides, e.g., does not react with other polypeptides.

As used herein, the term “area-under-the-curve” or “AUC” refers to theintegrated area under the % FBGL vs. time curve for a subject after agiven dose of an insulin-Fc fusion protein configuration isadministered. As used herein, the term “area-over-the curve” or “AOC” isused as a measure of the biological potency of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein configuration such that the AOC equals the difference betweenthe total possible area under the % FBGL vs. time curve and the AUCvalue. As used herein, the “normalized area-over-the curve,” “normalizedAOC,” or “NAOC” is the AOC value divided by the actual dose ofinsulin-Fc fusion protein administered. As used herein, the term“normalized AOC ratio” or “NAOCR” is the ratio of the NAOC resultingfrom a particular administration of an insulin-Fc fusion protein to theNAOC resulting from the first administration of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein in a series of administrations. The NAOCR thus provides ameasure of the change in biological activity of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein after repeated administrations.

As used herein, the term “bioactivity,” “activity,” “biologicalactivity,” “potency,” “bioactive potency,” or “biological potency”refers to the extent to which an insulin-Fc fusion protein activates theinsulin receptor and/or exerts a reduction in blood glucose levels in atarget subject. As used herein, “in vitro activity” or “insulin receptoractivity” refers to the affinity with which an insulin-Fc fusion proteinbinds to the insulin receptor and is typically measured by theconcentration at which an insulin-Fc fusion protein displaces half of aninsulin reference standard from the insulin receptor in a competitivebinding assay (i.e., IC50). As used herein, “in vivo activity” refers tothe extent and duration of reduction in a target subject's fasting bloodglucose level after administration of an insulin-Fc fusion protein.

As used herein, the term “biosynthesis,” “recombinant synthesis,” or“recombinantly made” refers to the process by which an insulin-Fc fusionprotein is expressed within a host cell by transfecting the cell with anucleic acid molecule (e.g., vector) encoding the insulin-Fc fusionprotein (e.g., where the entire insulin-Fc fusion protein is encoded bya single nucleic acid molecule). Exemplary host cells include mammaliancells, e.g., HEK293 cells or CHO cells. The cells can be cultured usingstandard methods in the art and the expressed insulin-Fc fusion proteinmay be harvested and purified from the cell culture using standardmethods in the art.

As used herein, the term “cell surface receptor” refers to a moleculesuch as a protein, generally found on the external surface of themembrane of a cell and which interacts with soluble molecules, e.g.,molecules that circulate in the blood supply. In some embodiments, acell surface receptor may include a hormone receptor (e.g., an insulinhormone receptor or insulin receptor (IR)) or an Fc receptor which bindsto an Fc fragment or the Fc region of an antibody (e.g., an Fc(gamma)receptor, for example Fc(gamma) receptor I, or an Fc neonatal receptor,for example FcRn). As used herein, “in vitro activity” or “Fc(gamma)receptor activity” or “Fc(gamma) receptor binding” or “FcRn receptoractivity” or “FcRn binding” refers to the affinity with which aninsulin-Fc fusion protein binds to the Fc receptor (e.g. Fc(gamma)receptor or FcRn receptor) and is typically measured by theconcentration of an insulin-Fc fusion protein that causes the insulin-Fcfusion protein to reach half of its maximum binding (i.e., EC50 value)as measured on an assay (e.g., an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) assay) using OD 450 nm values as measured on a microplatereader. Alternatively, the affinity with which an insulin-Fc fusionprotein binds to the Fc receptor (e.g., Fc(gamma) receptor or FcRnreceptor) is measured by the OD 450 nm value obtained on a microplatereader in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay at a givenconcentration of the insulin-Fc fusion protein.

As used herein, the term “fasting blood glucose level” or “FBGL” refersto the average blood glucose level in a target subject at the end of aperiod during which no food is administered and just prior to the timeat which an insulin-Fc fusion protein is administered. As used herein,the term “percent fasting blood glucose level,” “% fasting blood glucoselevel,” or “% FBGL” refers to the ratio of a given blood glucose levelto the fasting blood glucose level multiplied by 100.

As used herein, the term “immunogenic” or “immunogenicity” refers to thecapacity for a given molecule (e.g., an insulin-Fc fusion protein of thepresent invention) to provoke the immune system of a target subject.

As used herein, the term “insulin reference standard” is any one of: (i)a naturally occurring insulin from a mammal (e.g., a human or dog); (ii)an insulin polypeptide that does not comprise an Fc fragment; or (iii) astandard of care insulin (e.g., a commercially available insulin).

As used herein, the term “monomer” refers to a protein or a fusionprotein comprising a single polypeptide. In some examples, the “monomer”is a protein or a fusion protein, e.g., a single polypeptide, comprisingan insulin polypeptide and an Fc fragment polypeptide, wherein theinsulin polypeptide and Fc fragment polypeptide are joined by a peptidelinker to form the single polypeptide. In some examples, the monomer isencoded by a single nucleic acid molecule.

As used herein, “N-terminus” refers to the start of a protein orpolypeptide that is initiated by an amino acid containing a free aminegroup that is the alpha-amino group of the amino acid (e.g., the freeamino that is covalently linked to one carbon atom that is locatedadjacent to a second carbon atom, wherein the second carbon atom is partof the carbonyl group of the amino acid). As used herein, “C-terminus”refers to the end of a protein or polypeptide that is terminated by anamino acid containing a carboxylic acid group, wherein the carbon atomof the carboxylic acid group is located adjacent to the alpha-aminogroup of the amino acid.

As used herein, “pharmacodynamics” or “PD” generally refers to thebiological effects of an insulin-Fc fusion protein in a subject.Specifically, herein the PD refers to the measure of the reduction infasting blood glucose level over time in a subject after theadministration of an insulin-Fc fusion protein.

As used herein, “pharmacokinetics” or “PK” generally refers to thecharacteristic interactions of an insulin-Fc fusion protein and the bodyof the subject in terms of its absorption, distribution, metabolism, andexcretion. Specifically, herein the PK refers to the concentration of aninsulin-Fc fusion protein in the blood or serum of a subject at a giventime after the administration of the insulin-Fc fusion protein. As usedherein, “half-life” refers to the time taken for the concentration ofinsulin-Fc fusion protein in the blood or serum of a subject to reachhalf of its original value as calculated from a first order exponentialdecay model for drug elimination. Insulin-Fc fusion proteins withgreater “half-life” values demonstrate greater duration of action in thetarget subject.

The terms “sequence identity” “sequence homology” “homology” or“identical” in amino acid or nucleotide sequences as used hereindescribes that the same nucleotides or amino acid residues are foundwithin the variant and reference sequences when a specified, contiguoussegment of the nucleotide sequence or amino acid sequence of the variantis aligned and compared to the nucleotide sequence or amino acidsequence of the reference sequence. Methods for sequence alignment andfor determining identity between sequences are known in the art,including the use of Clustal Omega, which organizes, aligns, andcompares sequences for similarity, wherein the software highlights eachsequence position and compares across all sequences at that position andassigns one of the following scores: an “*” (asterisk) for sequencepositions which have a single, fully conserved residue, a “:” (colon)indicates conservation between groups of strongly similar propertieswith scoring greater than 0.5 in the Gonnet PAM 250 matrix, and a “.”(period) indicates conservation between groups of weakly similarproperties with scoring less than or equal to 0.5 in the Gonnet PAM 250matrix, a “-” (dash) indicates a sequence gap, meaning that no localhomology exists within a particular set of comparisons within a certainrange of the sequences, and an empty space “ ” indicates little or nosequence homology for that particular position across the comparedsequences. With respect to optimal alignment of two nucleotidesequences, the contiguous segment of the variant nucleotide sequence mayhave additional nucleotides or deleted nucleotides with respect to thereference nucleotide sequence. Likewise, for purposes of optimalalignment of two amino acid sequences, the contiguous segment of thevariant amino acid sequence may have additional amino acid residues ordeleted amino acid residues with respect to the reference amino acidsequence. In some embodiments, the contiguous segment used forcomparison to the reference nucleotide sequence or reference amino acidsequence will comprise at least 6, 10, 15, or 20 contiguous nucleotides,or amino acid residues, and may be 30, 40, 50, 100, or more nucleotidesor amino acid residues. Corrections for increased sequence identityassociated with inclusion of gaps in the variant's nucleotide sequenceor amino acid sequence can be made by assigning gap penalties. Methodsof sequence alignment are known in the art.

In embodiments, the determination of percent identity or “homology”between two sequences is accomplished using a mathematical algorithm.For example, the percent identity of an amino acid sequence isdetermined using the Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm using anaffine 6 gap search with a gap open penalty of 12 and a gap extensionpenalty of 2, BLOSUM matrix 62. In embodiments, the percent identity ofa nucleotide sequence is determined using the Smith-Waterman homologysearch algorithm using a gap open penalty of 25 and a gap extensionpenalty of 5. Such a determination of sequence identity can be performedusing, for example, the DeCypher Hardware Accelerator from TimeLogic.

As used herein, the term “homology” is used to compare two or moreproteins by locating common structural characteristics and commonspatial distribution of, for instance, beta strands, helices, and folds.Accordingly, homologous protein structures are defined by spatialanalyses. Measuring structural homology involves computing thegeometric-topological features of a space. One approach used to generateand analyze three-dimensional (3D) protein structures is homologymodeling (also called comparative modeling or knowledge-based modeling)which works by finding similar sequences since 3D similarity reflects 2Dsimilarity. Homologous structures do not imply sequence similarity as anecessary condition.

As used herein, the term “subject” or “target subject” or “patient” or“patient subject” are intended to include felines. Exemplary felinesubjects include cats having a disease or a disorder, e.g., diabetes oranother disease or disorder described herein, or normal subjects.

As used herein, the term “titer” or “yield” refers to the amount of afusion protein product (e.g., an insulin-Fc fusion protein describedherein) resulting from the biosynthesis (e.g., in a mammalian cell,e.g., in a HEK293 cell or CHO cell) per volume of the cell culture. Theamount of product may be determined at any step of the productionprocess (e.g., before or after purification), but the yield or titer isalways stated per volume of the original cell culture. As used herein,the term “product yield” or “total protein yield” refers to the totalamount of insulin-Fc fusion protein expressed by cells and purified viaat least one affinity chromatography step (e.g., Protein A or Protein G)and includes monomers of insulin-Fc fusion protein, homodimers ofinsulin-Fc fusion protein, and higher-order molecular aggregates ofhomodimers of insulin-Fc fusion protein. As used herein, the term“percent homodimer” or “% homodimer” refers to the proportion of afusion protein product (e.g., an insulin-Fc fusion protein describedherein) that is the desired homodimer. As used herein, the term“homodimer titer” refers to the product of the % homodimer and the totalprotein yield after Protein A purification step reported per volume ofthe cell culture.

As used herein, the terms “treat” or “treating” a subject having adisease or a disorder refer to subjecting the subject to a regimen, forexample the administration of a fusion protein, such as a fusion proteindescribed herein, such that at least one symptom of the disease ordisorder is cured, healed, alleviated, relieved, altered, remedied,ameliorated, or improved. Treating includes administering an amounteffective to alleviate, relieve, alter, remedy, ameliorate, improve, oraffect the disease or disorder, or the symptoms of the disease ordisorder. The treatment may inhibit deterioration or worsening of asymptom of a disease or disorder.

Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Components and Structure

The present disclosure relates to a composition of a fusion protein(i.e., an insulin-Fc fusion protein described herein comprises)comprising an insulin polypeptide linked via a peptide linker to aspecies-specific Fc fragment, and its use to treat diabetes in dogs. Asused herein, the terms “fusion protein” and “insulin-Fc fusion protein”refer to a protein comprising more than one part, for example fromdifferent sources (different proteins, polypeptides, cells, etc.), thatare covalently linked through peptide bonds. The insulin-Fc fusionproteins are covalently linked by (i) connecting the genes that encodefor each part into a single nucleic acid molecule and (ii) expressing ina host cell (e.g., HEK or CHO) the protein for which the nucleic acidmolecule encodes as follows: (N-terminus)-insulin polypeptide-linker-Fcfragment-(C-terminus). The fully recombinant synthesis approach ispreferred over methods in which the insulin polypeptide and Fc fragmentsare synthesized separately and then chemically conjugated. The chemicalconjugation step and subsequent purification process increase themanufacturing complexity, reduce product yield, and increase cost.

As used herein, the term “dimer” refers to a protein or a fusion proteincomprising two polypeptides linked covalently. In embodiments, twoidentical polypeptides are linked covalently (e.g., via disulfide bonds)forming a “homodimer”. FIG. 1 diagrammatically represents an insulin-Fcfusion protein homodimer. The insulin polypeptide comprises a B-chain, aC-chain and an A-chain, and each insulin polypeptide is joined via apeptide linker to an Fc fragment. Two identical insulin-Fc fusionprotein monomers are joined together via disulfide bonds to form aninsulin-Fc fusion protein homodimer. The total number of disulfide bondsmay be greater or less than the number shown in FIG. 1. The Fc fragmentcomprises a conserver asparagine (N)-glycosylation site, at whichglycols may bond during recombinant manufacturing of the insulin-Fcfusion protein in mammalian cells. In embodiments, the homodimer isencoded by a single nucleic acid molecule, wherein the homodimer is maderecombinantly inside a cell by first forming insulin-Fc fusion proteinmonomers and by then assembling two identical insulin-Fc fusion proteinmonomers into the homodimer upon further processing inside the cell.

As used herein, the terms “multimer,” “multimeric,” or “multimericstate” refer to non-covalent, associated forms of Fc fusion proteindimers that may be in equilibrium with Fc fusion protein dimers or mayact as permanently aggregated versions of Fc fusion protein dimers(e.g., dimers of Fc fusion protein homodimers, trimers of Fc fusionprotein homodimers, tetramers of Fc fusion protein homodimers, or higherorder aggregates containing five or more Fc fusion protein homodimers).It may be expected that multimeric forms of Fc fusion proteins may havedifferent physical, stability, or pharmacologic activities from that ofthe, e.g., insulin-Fc fusion protein homodimers.

Insulin Polypeptide

An insulin polypeptide may be, for example, an insulin or insulin analogproduced by β-cells in the islets of Langerhans within the pancreas.Insulin functions by regulating the absorption of glucose from theblood. Upon a stimulus, such as increased protein and glucose levels,insulin is released from β-cells and binds to the insulin receptor (IR),initiating a signal cascade that affects many aspects of mammalian(e.g., human, feline, etc.) metabolism. Disruption of this process isdirectly related to several diseases, notably diabetes, insulinoma,insulin resistance, metabolic syndromes, and polycystic ovary syndrome.

Insulin analogs of the present disclosure may be related to thestructure of insulin yet contain one or more modifications. In someembodiments, the insulin analog comprises at least one amino acidsubstitution, deletion, addition, or chemical modification relative toinsulin, which may impact a particular feature or characteristic of theinsulin-Fc fusion protein (e.g., insulin-Fc fusion protein describedherein) configuration. For example, the modifications or alterationsdescribed herein may impact the structure, stability, pH sensitivity,bioactivity, or binding affinity of the insulin-Fc fusion protein to acell surface receptor (e.g., an insulin hormone receptor). In someembodiments, an amino acid substitution, addition, deletion, or achemical modification relative to insulin may affect the activity of theinsulin or insulin analog relative to a reference standard. In someembodiments, the position of the amino acid sequence is referenced tothe N-terminus of the insulin polypeptide, with position 1 being thefirst amino acid of the B-chain of the insulin polypeptide. Inembodiments, the insulin or insulin analog is a three-segment peptidecomprising elements of a B-chain, a C-peptide, and an A-chain. Inembodiments, the insulin or insulin analog comprises a wild-type insulinB, C, and/or A chain, e.g., from a cat. In other embodiments, aninsulin-Fc fusion protein described herein comprises an insulinpolypeptide comprising a mutant insulin B-chain, C-peptide, and/orA-chain configuration to a cell surface receptor (e.g., an insulinhormone receptor) relative to a reference standard.

The amino acid sequence of insulin is strongly conserved throughoutevolution, particularly in vertebrates. For example, native canine andporcine insulins differ by only one amino acid from human insulin,native bovine insulin differs by only three amino acids from humaninsulin, and native feline insulin differs by just four amino acids fromhuman insulin. As used herein, the terms “B-chain or B-chain analog”,“C-peptide” or “C-chain”, and “A-chain or A-chain analog” refer to thepeptide segments of an insulin polypeptide as illustrated in FIG. 1.Native insulin is a 51 amino acid hormone containing two peptide chains(i.e., a B-chain and an A-chain) connected via disulfide bonds (e.g.,disulfide bonds formed by one or more B-chain cysteine side chain thiolsand one or more A-chain cysteine side chain thiols). The A-chain ofnative insulin is 21 amino acids in length and the B-chain of nativeinsulin is 30 amino acids in length. In the native form of insulin, theA-chain contains one intrachain disulfide bond formed by two A-chaincysteine side chain thiols. For reference purposes, the sequences forthe human insulin B-chain of SEQ ID NO: 1 and the human insulin A-chainof SEQ ID NO: 2 are shown below:

(SEQ ID NO: 1) FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKT (SEQ ID NO: 2)GIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCN.

As used herein, the term “insulin” or “insulin polypeptide” encompassesmature insulin, preproinsulin, proinsulin, and naturally occurringinsulin, or analogs thereof. In embodiments, an insulin polypeptide canbe a full-length insulin polypeptide or a fragment thereof. Inembodiments, modifications to the sequence of the insulin or insulinanalog (e.g., amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions orchemical modifications) may be to the B-chain of insulin, the C-peptideof insulin, the A-chain of insulin, or any combination thereof. Inembodiments, the C-chain peptide comprises an amino acid sequencelocated between the B-chain and the A-chain, and the C-peptidecovalently connects the B-chain and A-chain via peptide bonds.

Insulin is normally constructed as aN-terminus-B-chain:C-chain:A-chain-C-terminus polypeptide, wherein theC-chain is cleaved to make it bioactive. For reference purposes, thesequence of the entire human insulin molecule including the C-chain(i.e., human proinsulin) is shown below with the C-chain in bold:

(SEQ ID NO: 3) FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKTRREAEDLQVGQVELGGGPGAGSLQPLALEGSLQKRGIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCN.

The transformation of the single-chain insulin polypeptide into abioactive two-chain polypeptide is normally accomplished within theβ-cells of the islets of Langerhans prior to glucose-stimulated insulinsecretion by two endoproteases, Type I endoproteases, PC1 and PC3, thatdisrupt the C peptide-B chain connection and PC2, and a Type IIendoprotease, that cleaves the C peptide-A chain bond at exactly theright sites. However, cell systems used for the biosynthesis oftherapeutic molecules such as insulin (e.g., bacteria, yeast, andmammalian (e.g., HEK and CHO) cell systems) do not possess this pathway,and therefore the transformation must take place after expression andharvesting of the single chain polypeptide using chemical or enzymaticmethods. All the known techniques for cleaving the C-chain afterexpression and harvesting rely on first modifying the C-chain such thatit terminates in a lysine just before the N-terminus of the A-chain.Then, using an enzyme selected from the trypsin or Lys-C families, whichclips peptide bonds specifically at the C-termini of lysine residues,the single chain-insulin polypeptide is cleaved at the C-terminal lysineof the C-chain and at the C-terminal lysine at the 29th position fromthe N-terminus of the B-chain. In some cases, the resulting bioactivetwo-chain insulin is used without reattaching the clipped amino acid atthe 30th position from the N-terminus of the B-chain, and in some casesthe clipped amino acid at the 30th position from the N-terminus of theB-chain is added back to the molecule using an additional enzymaticmethod. Such a process works well with insulin because it contains onlyone lysine in its entire two chain polypeptide form. However, thisprocess cannot be used on the insulin-Fc fusion proteins containedherein, because all known Fc fragments contain multiple lysine residues.The enzymatic cleavage process would, therefore, digest the Fc fragmentinto non-functional parts, thereby eliminating the ability of the Fcfragment to prolong the action of the insulin polypeptide in vivo.Therefore, an insulin-Fc fusion protein of the present invention mustcomprise an insulin polypeptide that does not require C-chain cleavageand is therefore bioactive in its single chain form.

Several bioactive single chain insulin polypeptides have been describedin the art. In all cases, the single chain insulin polypeptides containC-chains of specific length and composition as well as A-chains andB-chains mutated at specific amino acid sites to achieve electrostaticbalance, prevent aggregation, and enhance insulin receptor (IR) bindingand/or downstream signaling to achieve bioactivity at levels comparableto that of the native two-chain insulin. Herein, the location ofmutations on peptide segments are notated using the name of the segment(e.g., B-chain, C-chain, A-chain) and the number of the amino acidcounting from the N-terminus of the segment. For example, the notation“B10” refers to the 10th amino acid from the N-terminus of the aminoacid sequence of the B-chain. The notation “A8” refers to the 8th aminoacid from the N-terminus of the A-chain. Furthermore, if an amino acidis mutated from its native form to a new amino acid at a particularlocation, the location is appended with the one letter amino acid codefor the new amino acid. For example, B10D refers to an aspartic acidmutation at the 10th amino acid from the N-terminus of the amino acidsequence of the B-chain and A8H refers to a histidine mutation at the8th amino acid from the N-terminus of the amino acid sequence of theA-chain.

The insulin polypeptide of an insulin-Fc fusion protein may comprise theamino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, or SEQ ID NO: 7.

(SEQ ID NO: 5) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCN (SEQ ID NO: 6)FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKAAAAAAAKGIVEQCCTSI CSLYQLENYCN(SEQ ID NO: 7) FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKAGGGPRRGIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCN

In embodiments, the insulin polypeptide of the insulin-Fc fusion proteincomprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4.

(SEQ ID NO: 4) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCN

In embodiments, modifications to the sequence of the insulin or insulinanalog (e.g., amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions orchemical modifications) may be added to either the B-chain of insulin,the C-peptide of insulin, the A-chain of insulin, or any combinationthereof. In embodiments, the C-chain peptide comprises an amino acidsequence located between the B-chain and the A-chain, and the C-peptidecovalently connects the B-chain and A-chain via peptide bonds.

In an embodiment, the insulin polypeptide comprises a C-peptide, e.g., aC-chain element which comprises the amino acid sequence GGGPRR (SEQ IDNO: 8).

Fc Fragment

In embodiments, a fusion protein described herein comprises an Fcfragment, e.g., connected to an insulin polypeptide described herein.

The term “Fc region,” “Fc domain.” “Fc polypeptide,” or “Fc fragment” asused herein is used to define a C-terminal region of an immunoglobulinheavy chain. The Fc fragment, region, or domain may be a native sequenceFc region or a variant/mutant Fc region. Although the boundaries of theFc region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain may vary, they generallycomprise some or all the hinge region of the heavy chain, the CH2 regionof the heavy chain, and the CH3 region of the heavy chain. The hingeregion of a feline antibody comprises amino acid sequences that connectthe CHI domain of the heavy chain to the CH2 region of the heavy chainand contains one or more cysteines that form one or more interheavychain disulfide bridges to form a homodimer of the Fc fusion proteinfrom two identical but separate monomers of the Fc fusion protein. Thehinge region may comprise all or part of a naturally occurring aminoacid sequence or a non-naturally occurring amino acid sequence.

Each IgG fragment contains a conserved asparagine (N)-glycosylation sitein the CH2 domain of each heavy chain of the Fc region. Herein, thenotation used to refer to the conserved N-glycosylation site is “cNg”.One way to remove the attached glycan from a synthesized insulin-Fcfusion protein is to mutate the cNg site to prevent the attachment ofglycans altogether during production in the host cell. Herein, thenotation used to describe a cNg mutation is cNg-(substituted aminoacid). For example, if the asparagine at the cNg site is mutated toserine, this mutation is notated as “cNg-S”.

The absolute position of the cNg site from the N-terminus of the B-chainof the insulin-Fc fusion protein varies depending on the length of theinsulin polypeptide, the length of the linker, and any omitted aminoacids in the Fc fragment prior to the cNg site. Herein, the notationused to refer to the absolute position of the cNg site in a giveninsulin-Fc fusion protein sequence (as measured counting from theN-terminus of the B-chain of the insulin-Fc fusion protein) is“NB(number)”. For example, if the cNg site is found at the 138th aminoacid position as counted from the N-terminus of the B-chain, theabsolute position of this site is referred to as cNg-NB138. As a furtherexample, if the cNg site is found at the 138th amino acid position ascounted from the N-terminus of the B-chain, and the asparagine at thissite is mutated to serine, this mutation is noted as “cNg-NB138-S”.

An Fc receptor (FcR) refers to a receptor that binds to an Fc fragmentor the Fc region of an antibody. In embodiments, the FcR is a nativesequence feline FcR. In embodiments, the FcR is one which binds an Fcfragment or the Fc region of an IgG antibody (a gamma receptor) andincludes without limitation, receptors of the Fc(gamma) receptor I,Fc(gamma) receptor IIa, Fc(gamma) receptor IIb, and Fc(gamma) receptorIII subclasses, including allelic variants and alternatively splicedforms of these receptors. “FcR” also includes the neonatal receptor,FcRn, which is responsible for the transfer of maternal IgGs to thefetus and is also responsible for the prolonged in vivo eliminationhalf-lives of antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins in vivo. In embodiments,an Fc fragment described herein is capable of binding to mammalianFc(gamma) or Fc(Rn) receptors, e.g., feline Fc(gamma) or feline Fc(Rn)receptor.

In embodiments, the Fc fragment comprises the Fc region (e.g., hingeregion, CH2 domain, and CH3 domain) of a mammalian IgG, e.g., felineIgG2. In embodiments, the Fc fragment comprises the hinge region (or afragment thereof) of a feline immunoglobulin (e.g., an IgG, e.g., IgG2).In embodiments, the Fc fragment comprises the Fc region (e.g., CH2domain and CH3 domain) of feline IgG2.

Examples of canine Fc fragments are given in SEQ ID NO: 11 (canineIgGA), SEQ ID NO: 12 (canine IgGB), SEQ ID NO: 13 (canine IgGC), and SEQID NO: 14 (canine IgGD).

(SEQ ID NO: 11) RCTDTPPCPVPEPLGGPSVLIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEVTCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQSREQQFNGTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIDLPSPIERTISKARGRAHKPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVSITCLIKDFYPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPERKHRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDPFTCAVMHETLQNHYTDLSLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 12)DCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFNGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICA VMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG(SEQ ID NO: 13) CNNCPCPGCGLLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDILVTARTPTVTCVVVDLDPENPEVQISWFVDSKQVQTANTQPREEQSNGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLSGKQFKCKVNNKALPSPIEEIISKTPGQAHQPNVYVLPPSRDEMSKNTVTLTCLVKDFFPPEIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQISLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 14)CISPCPVPESLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEITCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQPREQQFNSTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIGLPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVTLTCLIKDFFPPEIDVEWQSNGQPEPESKYHTTAPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDTFTCAVMHEALQNHYTDLSLSHSPG

In embodiments, the Fc fragment comprises a wild-type feline IgG2 withthe following amino acid sequence:

(SEQ ID NO: 21) GEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG.

Linker

In embodiments, a fusion protein described herein comprises a linker,e.g., between one or more domains of the polypeptide. For example, afusion protein comprises a linker between the insulin polypeptide andthe Fc fragment.

In embodiments, the linker is a peptide. In embodiments, the peptidelinker comprises amino acids (e.g., natural, or unnatural amino acids).In embodiments, the peptide linker can be encoded by a nucleic acidmolecule, (e.g., such that a single nucleic acid molecule can encode thevarious peptides within an insulin polypeptide as well as the peptidelinker as well as the Fc fragment). The peptide linker may comprise theamino acid sequence of GGGGAGGGG (SEQ ID NO: 9). In embodiments, thepeptide linker comprises the amino acid sequence GGGGSGGGG (SEQ ID NO:10).

Fusion Protein

Provided herein are fusion proteins, e.g., insulin-Fc fusion proteins.In embodiments, the fusion protein comprises an insulin polypeptidedescribed herein, e.g., in the Insulin polypeptide section herein. Inembodiments, the fusion protein comprises an Fc fragment, e.g., an Fcfragment described herein, e.g., in the Fc fragment section herein. Inembodiments, the fusion protein comprises a linker between the insulinpolypeptide described herein, e.g., in the Insulin polypeptide sectionherein and the Fc fragment, e.g., an Fc fragment described herein, e.g.,in the Fc fragment section herein. Exemplary linkers (e.g., peptidelinkers) are described in greater detail in the Linker section herein.

In embodiments, the insulin polypeptide comprises domains in thefollowing orientation from N- to C-termini:(N-terminus)-B-chain-C-peptide-A-chain-(C-terminus). In embodiments, theinsulin polypeptide is located on the N-terminal side of the Fcfragment. In embodiments, the fusion protein comprises domains in thefollowing orientation from N- to C-termini: (N-terminus)-insulinpolypeptide-linker-Fc fragment-(C-terminus) (e.g.,(N-terminus)-B-chain-C-peptide-A-chain-linker-Fc fragment-(C-terminus))as illustrated in FIG. 1. In embodiments, the fusion protein, alsoreferred to as the insulin-Fc fusion protein, is comprised of twoidentical insulin-Fc fusion proteins covalently bound together via oneor more disulfide bonds (shown as dotted lines in FIG. 1; total numberof disulfide bonds in actuality may be greater or lower than the numbershown in FIG. 1). Each insulin-Fc fusion protein comprises an insulinpolypeptide molecule containing an insulin B-chain and an insulinA-chain that are connected between the B-chain-C-terminal region and theA-chain-NH2 terminal region with a C-chain (gray line in FIG. 1), andthe A-chain-C-terminal region and Fc-chain amino terminus with a linker,where the insulin-Fc fusion protein sequence terminates in theFc-CH3-C-terminal region. Note that the B-chain and A-chain are alsolinked together via two disulfide bonds (dotted lines in FIG. 1). TheA-chain also has an intramolecular disulfide bond (not shown in FIG. 1).

The full-length sequences of the insulin-Fc fusion proteins of thepresent technology are provided below:

(SEQ ID NO: 32) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG(SEQ ID NO: 34) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFSSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG(SEQ ID NO: 36) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG

The “full aa sequences” of the fusion proteins of SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ IDNO: 34 and SEQ ID NO: 36 may include a leader sequence. In embodiments,a fusion protein described herein does not include a leader sequence atthe N-terminus. In other embodiments, a fusion protein described hereinincludes a leader sequence, e.g., at the N-terminus. An exemplary leadersequence includes the amino acid sequence MEWSWVFLFFLSVTTGVHS (SEQ IDNO: 38). In embodiments, a fusion protein described herein is encoded bya nucleic acid molecule comprising a leader sequence, e.g., forexpression (e.g., recombinant expression) in cells (e.g., eukaryotic,e.g., mammalian cells). In embodiments, the leader sequence is part ofthe fusion protein inside a cell and then the leader sequence is cleavedoff, e.g., within the cell or in the cell culture, during expression ofthe fusion protein into the cell culture media via a process (e.g., anenzymatic process).

An exemplary nucleic acid sequence encoding a leader sequence includesthe nucleic acid sequenceATGGAATGGAGCTGGGTCTTTCTCTTCTTCCTGTCAGTAACGACTGGTGTCCACTCC (SEQ ID NO:39). In other embodiments, a fusion protein described herein is encodedby a nucleic acid molecule not comprising a leader sequence.

An exemplary nucleic acid sequence encoding the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 32 is given below:

(SEQ ID NO: 33) ATGGAATGGAGCTGGGTCTTTCTCTTCTTCCTGTCAGTAACGACTGGTGTCCACTCCTTCGTGAACCAGCACCTGTGCGGCTCCGACCTGGTGGAAGCTCTGTATCTCGTGTGCGGCGAGCGGGGCTTCTTCTACACCGATCCCACTGGAGGCGGTCCACGCAGAGGCATCGTGGAACAGTGCTGCCACTCCATCTGCTCCCTGTACCAGCTGGAAAACTACTGCAATGGCGGAGGTGGTTCAGGAGGCGGTGGAGGTGAGGGCCCCAAGTGCCCCGTGCCCGAGATTCCCGGTGCCCCCAGCGTGTTCATCTTTCCCCCAAAACCCAAGGACACCCTGAGCATCAGCAGGACCCCCGAGGTGACCTGCCTGGTGGTGGACCTGGGACCCGACGACAGCAACGTGCAGATCACCTGGTTCGTGGACAACACCGAGATGCACACCGCCAAGACCAGGCCTCGGGAGGAGCAGTTCAACAGCACCTACAGGGTGGTGAGCGTGCTGCCCATCCTGCACCAGGACTGGCTGAAGGGCAAGGAGTTCAAGTGCAAGGTGAACAGCAAGAGCCTGCCCAGCGCCATGGAGAGGACCATCAGCAAGGCCAAGGGTCAGCCCCACGAGCCCCAAGTGTACGTGCTTCCCCCGACCCAGGAGGAGTTGAGCGAGAACAAAGTGAGCGTGACCTGCCTGATCAAGGGCTTCCACCCTCCCGACATCGCCGTGGAGTGGGAGATCACCGGCCAGCCTGAGCCGGAAAATAACTACCAGACCACCCCTCCACAGCTGGACAGCGACGGCACCTACTTCCTTTACAGCAGGCTGTCTGTGGACCGAAGCCATTGGCAAAGGGGCAACACCTACACCTGCAGCGTGAGCCACGAGGCTCTGCACAGCCACCACACCCAGAAGTCTCTGACC CAGAGCCCCGGATAG

An exemplary nucleic acid sequence encoding the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 34 is given below:

(SEQ ID NO: 35) ATGGAATGGAGCTGGGTCTTTCTCTTCTTCCTGTCAGTAACGACTGGTGTCCACTCCTTCGTGAACCAGCACCTGTGCGGCTCCGACCTGGTGGAAGCTCTGTATCTCGTGTGCGGCGAGCGGGGCTTCTTCTACACCGATCCCACTGGAGGCGGTCCACGCAGAGGCATCGTGGAACAGTGCTGCCACTCCATCTGCTCCCTGTACCAGCTGGAAAACTACTGCAATGGCGGAGGTGGTTCAGGAGGCGGTGGAGGTGAGGGCCCCAAGTGCCCCGTGCCCGAGATTCCCGGTGCCCCCAGCGTGTTCATCTTTCCCCCAAAACCCAAGGACACCCTGAGCATCAGCAGGACCCCCGAGGTGACCTGCCTGGTGGTGGACCTGGGACCCGACGACAGCAACGTGCAGATCACCTGGTTCGTGGACAACACCGAGATGCACACCGCCAAGACCAGGCCTCGGGAGGAGCAGTTCAGCAGCACCTACAGGGTGGTGAGCGTGCTGCCCATCCTGCACCAGGACTGGCTGAAGGGCAAGGAGTTCAAGTGCAAGGTGAACAGCAAGAGCCTGCCCAGCGCCATGGAGAGGACCATCAGCAAGGCCAAGGGTCAGCCCCACGAGCCCCAAGTGTACGTGCTTCCCCCGACCCAGGAGGAGTTGAGCGAGAACAAAGTGAGCGTGACCTGCCTGATCAAGGGCTTCCACCCTCCCGACATCGCCGTGGAGTGGGAGATCACCGGCCAGCCTGAGCCGGAAAATAACTACCAGACCACCCCTCCACAGCTGGACAGCGACGGCACCTACTTCCTTTACAGCAGGCTGTCTGTGGACCGAAGCCATTGGCAAAGGGGCAACACCTACACCTGCAGCGTGAGCCACGAGGCTCTGCACAGCCACCACACCCAGAAGTCTCTGACC CAGAGCCCCGGATAG

An exemplary nucleic acid sequence encoding the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ NO: 36 is given below:

(SEQ ID NO: 37) ATGGAATGGAGCTGGGTCTTTCTCTTCTTCCTGTCAGTAACGACTGGTGTCCACTCCTTCGTGAACCAGCACCTGTGCGGCTCCGACCTGGTGGAAGCTCTGTATCTCGTGTGCGGCGAGCGGGGCTTCTTCTACACCGATCCCACTGGAGGCGGTCCACGCAGAGGCATCGTGGAACAGTGCTGCCACTCCATCTGCTCCCTGTACCAGCTGGAAAACTACTGCAATGGCGGAGGTGGTTCAGGAGGCGGTGGAGGTGAGGGCCCCAAGTGCCCCGTGCCCGAGATTCCCGGTGCCCCCAGCGTGTTCATCTTTCCCCCAAAACCCAAGGACACCCTGAGCATCAGCAGGACCCCCGAGGTGACCTGCCTGGTGGTGGACCTGGGACCCGACGACAGCAACGTGCAGATCACCTGGTTCGTGGACAACACCGAGATGCACACCGCCAAGACCAGGCCTCGGGAGGAGCAGTTCAAGAGCACCTACAGGGTGGTGAGCGTGCTGCCCATCCTGCACCAGGACTGGCTGAAGGGCAAGGAGTTCAAGTGCAAGGTGAACAGCAAGAGCCTGCCCAGCGCCATGGAGAGGACCATCAGCAAGGCCAAGGGTCAGCCCCACGAGCCCCAAGTGTACGTGCTTCCCCCGACCCAGGAGGAGTTGAGCGAGAACAAAGTGAGCGTGACCTGCCTGATCAAGGGCTTCCACCCTCCCGACATCGCCGTGGAGTGGGAGATCACCGGCCAGCCTGAGCCGGAAAATAACTACCAGACCACCCCTCCACAGCTGGACAGCGACGGCACCTACTTCCTTTACAGCAGGCTGTCTGTGGACCGAAGCCATTGGCAAAGGGGCAACACCTACACCTGCAGCGTGAGCCACGAGGCTCTGCACAGCCACCACACCCAGAAGTCTCTGACCCAGAGCCCCGGATAG

In some embodiments, the fusion protein is in a preparation. Inembodiments, the preparation has a percent dimer, e.g., homodimer, ofthe fusion protein that is greater than about 50%, e.g., greater thanabout 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about85%, about 90%, 95% or about 100%. In embodiments, the percent dimer,e.g., homodimer, of the fusion protein preparation is 91%, 92%, 91%,94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100%. In embodiments, the percenthomodimer is about 70% or higher (e.g., 80%, 85%, or 88% or more) andcan be made 90% or higher (e.g., 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or nearly 100%)using one or more processing steps (e.g., ion exchange chromatography,gel filtration, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, etc.). In someembodiments, the % dimer, e.g., homodimer, in the preparation isdetermined by size-exclusion chromatography which is an analyticalseparation method that can discriminate between dimers, e.g.,homodimers, and higher-order non-covalent Fc fusion protein aggregates(e.g., multimers). In some embodiments, the % dimer is determined to begreater than 95%, e.g., as determined by size-exclusion chromatography.In some embodiments, the % dimer, e.g., homodimer, is determined to begreater than 99%, e.g., as determined by size-exclusion chromatography.In some embodiments, insulin-Fc fusion proteins with substantiallygreater homodimer content than other insulin-Fc fusion proteinsdemonstrate more bioactivity in a subject (e.g., a cat)

Fusion Protein Production

In embodiments, a fusion protein can be expressed by a vector asdescribed in the Examples section.

Expression and Purification

In embodiments, a fusion protein can be expressed recombinantly, e.g.,in a eukaryotic cell, e.g., mammalian cell or non-mammalian cell.Exemplary mammalian cells used for expression include HEK cells, e.g.,HEK293 cells, or CHO cells. In embodiments, cells are transfected with anucleic acid molecule, e.g., vector, encoding the fusion protein (e.g.,where the entire fusion protein is encoded by a single nucleic acidmolecule). In other embodiments, cells are transfected with more thanone nucleic acid molecule, where each nucleic acid molecule encodes adifferent domain of the fusion protein. For example, one nucleic acidmolecule can encode the insulin polypeptide, and a different nucleicacid molecule can encode the Fc fragment. Cells can be cultured usingstandard methods in the art.

In some embodiments, the fusion protein is purified or isolated from thecells (e.g., by lysis of the cells). In other embodiments, the fusionprotein is secreted by the cells and, e.g., the fusion protein ispurified or isolated from the cell culture media in which the cells weregrown. Purification of the fusion protein can include using columnchromatography, e.g., affinity chromatography, or using other separationmethods that involve size, charge, and/or affinity for certainmolecules. In embodiments, purification of the fusion protein involvesselecting or enriching for proteins with an Fc fragment, e.g., by usingProtein A beads or a Protein A column that cause proteins containing anFc fragment to become bound with high affinity at neutral solution pH tothe Protein A covalently conjugated to the Protein A beads. The bound Fcfusion protein may then be eluted from the Protein A beads by a changein a solution variable (e.g., a decrease in the solution pH). Otherseparation methods such as ion exchange chromatography and/or gelfiltration chromatography can also be employed alternatively or inaddition. In embodiments, purification of the fusion protein furthercomprises filtering or centrifuging the protein preparation. Inembodiments, further purification of the fusion protein comprisesdiafiltration, ultrafiltration, and filtration through porous membranesof various sizes, as well as final formulation with excipients.

The purified fusion protein can be characterized, e.g., for purity,yield, structure, and/or activity, using a variety of methods, e.g.,absorbance at 280 nm (e.g., to determine yield), size exclusion orcapillary electrophoresis (e.g., to determine the molecular weight,percent aggregation, and/or purity), mass spectrometry (MS) and/orliquid chromatography (LC-MS) (e.g., to determine purity and/orglycosylation), and/or ELISA (e.g., to determine extent of binding,e.g., affinity, to an anti-insulin antibody). Exemplary methods ofcharacterization are also described in the Examples section.

Functional Features of Fusion Proteins

Described herein are methods for treating diabetes (e.g., felinediabetes), the methods comprising the administration of a fusion protein(e.g., a fusion protein described herein) to a subject. In embodiments,a fusion protein described herein is capable of lowering glucose levels(e.g., blood glucose levels) after administration in a subject. Inembodiments, the glucose lowering activity of the fusion protein isgreater than that of an insulin reference standard. In some embodiments,the duration of activity of the fusion protein can be measured by adecrease, e.g., a statistically significant decrease, in blood glucoserelative to a pre-dose glucose level. In embodiments, the fusion proteinis long-acting (e.g., has a long half-life, e.g., in serum). Inembodiments, the serum half-life of the fusion protein (e.g., in theblood of a subject upon administration) is longer than about 2 hours. Inembodiments, the serum half-life of the fusion protein is 4 days, orlonger. In embodiments, the serum half-life of the fusion protein islonger than that of an insulin reference standard or controlformulation.

In embodiments, the duration of activity of the fusion protein (e.g.,the time during which there is a statistically significant decrease inblood glucose level in a subject relative to a pre-dose level) is longerthan about 2 hours. In embodiments, the duration of activity of thefusion protein (e.g., the time during which there is a statisticallysignificant decrease in blood glucose level in a subject relative to apre-dose level) is longer than about 6 hours, 9 hours, 12 hours, 18hours, 1 day, 1.5 days, 2 days, 2.5 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days orlonger. In embodiments, the duration of activity of the fusion protein(e.g., the time during which there is a statistically significantdecrease in blood glucose level in a subject relative to a pre-doselevel) is longer than that of an insulin reference standard or controlformulation.

Methods of Treatment and Characteristics of Subject Selection

Described herein are methods for interacting with the insulin receptorsto lower blood glucose in felines, wherein the method comprisesadministering to a subject a fusion protein, e.g., a fusion proteindescribed herein. In some embodiments, the subject has been diagnosedwith diabetes (e.g., feline diabetes).

In embodiments, a reference standard used in any method described hereincomprises a reference treatment or reference therapy. In someembodiments, the reference comprises a standard of care agent fordiabetes treatment (e.g., a standard of care agent for feline diabetes).In some embodiments, the reference standard is a commercially availableinsulin or insulin analog. In some embodiments, the reference standardcomprises a long-lasting insulin, intermediate-lasting insulin,short-lasting insulin, rapid-acting insulin, short-acting,intermediate-acting, long-acting insulin. In some embodiments, thereference standard comprises Vetsulin®, Prozinc®, insulin NPH, insulinglargine (Lantus®), or recombinant human insulin.

In embodiments, a reference standard used in any method described hereinincludes an outcome, e.g., outcome described herein, of a diabetestherapy (e.g., a feline diabetes therapy).

In embodiments, a reference standard is a level of a marker (e.g., bloodglucose or fructosamine) in the subject prior to initiation of atherapy, e.g., a fusion protein therapy described herein; where thesubject has diabetes. In embodiments, the blood glucose level in a catis greater than 200 mg/dL (e.g., greater than 250 mg/dL, 300 mg/dL, 350mg/dL, 400 mg/dL or more) prior to initiation of therapy. Inembodiments, the fructosamine level in a cat is greater than 250micromol/L, 350 micromol/L (e.g., greater than 400 micromol/L, 450micromol/L, 500 micromol/L, 550 micromol/L, 600 micromol/L, 650micromol/L, 700 micromol/L, 750 micromol/L or more) prior to initiationof therapy. In embodiments, a reference standard is a measure of thepresence of or the progression of or the severity of the disease. Inembodiments, a reference standard is a measure of the presence of or theseverity of the disease symptoms prior to initiation of a therapy, e.g.,a fusion protein therapy described herein, e.g., where the subject hasdiabetes.

Pharmaceutical Compositions and Routes of Administration

Provided herein are pharmaceutical compositions containing a fusionprotein described herein that can be used to lower blood glucose incats. The amount and concentration of the fusion protein in thepharmaceutical compositions, as well as the quantity of thepharmaceutical composition administered to a subject, can be selectedbased on clinically relevant factors, such as medically relevantcharacteristics of the subject (e.g. age, weight, gender, other medicalconditions, and the like), the solubility of compounds in thepharmaceutical compositions, the potency and activity of the compounds,and the manner of administration of the pharmaceutical compositions.

Formulations of the present disclosure include those suitable forparenteral administration. The phrases “parenteral administration” and“administered parenterally” as used herein means modes of administrationother than enteral and topical administration, usually by intravenous orsubcutaneous injection.

Examples of suitable aqueous and non-aqueous carriers that may beemployed in the pharmaceutical compositions of the disclosure includewater, ethanol, polyols (such as glycerol, propylene glycol,polyethylene glycol, and the like), and suitable mixtures thereof,vegetable oils, such as olive oil, and injectable organic esters, suchas ethyl oleate. Proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, usingcoating materials, such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the requiredparticle size in the case of dispersions, and using surfactants, e.g.,Tween-like surfactants. In some embodiments, the pharmaceuticalcomposition (e.g., as described herein) comprises a Tween-likesurfactant, e.g., Tween-20 or Tween-80. In some embodiments, thepharmaceutical composition (e.g., as described herein) comprises aTween-like surfactant, Tween-like surfactant, e.g., polysorbate-20,Tween-20, or Tween-80, at a concentration between about 0.001% and about2%, or between about 0.005% and about 0.1%, or between about 0.01% andabout 0.5%.

In some embodiments, the fusion protein is administered as a bolus,infusion, or an intravenous push. In some embodiments, the fusionprotein is administered through syringe injection, pump, pen, needle, orindwelling catheter. Methods of introduction may also be provided byrechargeable or biodegradable devices. Various slow release polymericdevices have been developed and tested in vivo in recent years for thecontrolled delivery of drugs, including proteinaceousbiopharmaceuticals. A variety of biocompatible polymers (includinghydrogels), including both biodegradable and non-degradable polymers,can be used to form an implant for the sustained release of a compoundat a particular target site.

Dosages

Actual dosage levels of the fusion protein can be varied to obtain anamount of the active ingredient that is effective to achieve the desiredtherapeutic response for a particular cat. The selected dosage levelwill depend upon a variety of factors including the activity of theparticular fusion protein employed, or the ester, salt or amide thereof,the route of administration, the time of administration, the rate ofexcretion of the particular compound being employed, the duration of thetreatment, other drugs, compounds and/or materials used in combinationwith the particular fusion protein employed, the age, sex, weight,condition, general health and prior medical history of the cat beingtreated, and like factors well known in the medical arts.

In general, a suitable dose of a fusion protein will be that amount ofthe fusion protein that is the lowest dose effective to produce atherapeutic effect. Such an effective dose will generally depend uponthe factors described above. Generally, intravenous, and subcutaneousdoses of the fusion protein for a cat will range from about 0.01 toabout 10 nanomoles per kilogram of body weight per day, e.g., 0.01-10nanomoles/kg/day, about 0.1-1 nanomoles/kg/day, about 1-10nanomoles/kg/day, or about 0.1-10 nanomoles/kg/day. In some embodiments,the fusion protein is administered at a dose greater than or equal to 3nmol/kg/day (e.g., greater than 4, 5, 6, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60nmol/kg/day). In still other embodiments, the fusion protein isadministered at a dose between 0.6-60 nanomoles per kilogram of bodyweight per week, or 0.6-6 nanomoles/kg/week.

The present disclosure contemplates formulation of the fusion protein inany of the aforementioned pharmaceutical compositions and preparations.Furthermore, the present disclosure contemplates administration via anyof the foregoing routes of administration. One of skill in the art canselect the appropriate formulation and route of administration based onthe condition being treated and the overall health, age, and size of thepatient being treated.

EXAMPLES

The present technology is further illustrated by the following Examples,which should not be construed as limiting in any way.

General Methods, Assays, and Materials Example 1: Synthesis and Methodsof Making an Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein in HEK293 Cells

Insulin-Fc fusion proteins were synthesized as follows. A gene sequenceof interest was constructed using proprietary software (LakePharma,Belmont, Calif.) and was cloned into a high expression mammalian vector.HEK293 cells were seeded in a shake flask 24 hours before transfectionand were grown using serum-free chemically defined media. A DNAexpression construct that encodes the insulin-Fc fusion protein ofinterest was transiently transfected into a suspension of HEK293 cellsusing the (LakePharma, Belmont, Calif.) standard operating procedure fortransient transfection. After 20 hours, the cells were counted todetermine the viability and viable cell count, and the titer wasmeasured by FortéBio® Octet® (Pall FortéBio LLC, Fremont, Calif.).Additional readings were taken throughout the transient transfectionproduction run. The culture was harvested on or after Day 5.

Example 2: Synthesis and Methods of Making an Insulin-Fc Fusion Proteinin HEK293 Cells

Insulin-Fc fusion proteins are synthesized as follows. A gene sequenceof interest is constructed using proprietary software (LakePharma,Belmont, Calif.) and is cloned into a high expression mammalian vector.HEK293 cells are seeded in a shake flask 24 hours before transfectionand are grown using serum-free chemically defined media. A DNAexpression construct that encodes the insulin-Fc fusion protein ofinterest is transiently transfected into a suspension of HEK293 cellsusing the (LakePharma, Belmont, Calif.) standard operating procedure fortransient transfection. After 20 hours, the cells are counted todetermine the viability and viable cell count, and the titer is measuredby FortéBio® Octet® (Pall FortéBio LLC, Fremont, Calif.). Additionalreadings are taken throughout the transient transfection production run.The culture is harvested on or after Day 5.

Example 3: Purification of an Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein

Purification of an insulin-Fc fusion protein was performed as follows.Conditioned media supernatants containing the secreted insulin-Fc fusionprotein were harvested from the transiently or stably transfected HEKproduction runs and were clarified by centrifugation. The supernatantcontaining the desired insulin-Fc fusion protein was run over a ProteinA or a Protein G column and eluted using a low pH gradient. Optionally,recovery of the insulin-Fc fusion proteins could be enhanced byreloading of the initial Protein A or Protein G column eluent again ontoa second Protein A or Protein G column. Afterwards, the eluted fractionscontaining the desired protein were pooled and buffer exchanged into 200mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaOAc, pH 7.0 buffer. A final filtrationstep was performed using a 0.2 μm membrane filter. The final proteinconcentration was calculated from the solution optical density at 280nm. Further optional purification by ion-exchange chromatography (e.g.,using an anion exchange bead resin or a cation exchange bead resin), gelfiltration chromatography, or other methods was performed, as necessary.

Example 4: Purification of an Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein

Purification of an insulin-Fc fusion protein is performed as follows.Conditioned media supernatants containing the secreted insulin-Fc fusionprotein are harvested from the transiently or stably transfected HEKproduction runs and are clarified by centrifugation. The supernatantcontaining the desired insulin-Fc fusion protein is run over a Protein Aor a Protein G column and eluted using a low pH gradient. Optionally,recovery of the insulin-Fc fusion proteins can be enhanced by reloadingof the initial Protein A or Protein G column eluent again onto a secondProtein A or Protein G column. Afterwards, the eluted fractionscontaining the desired protein are pooled and buffer exchanged into 200mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaOAc, pH 7.0 buffer. A final filtrationstep is performed using a 0.2 μm membrane filter. The final proteinconcentration is calculated from the solution optical density at 280 nm.Further optional purification by ion-exchange chromatography (e.g.,using an anion exchange bead resin or a cation exchange bead resin), gelfiltration chromatography, or other methods is performed, as necessary.

Example 5: Structure Confirmation by Non-Reducing and Reducing CE-SDS

Capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS) analysis wasperformed in a LabChip® GXII (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Mass.) on asolution of a purified insulin-Fc fusion protein dissolved in 200 mMHEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaOAc, pH 7.0 buffer, and the electropherogramwas plotted. Under non-reducing conditions, the sample was run againstknown molecular weight (MW) protein standards, and the eluting peakrepresented the ‘apparent’ MW of the insulin-Fc fusion proteinhomodimer.

Under reducing conditions (e.g., using beta-mercaptoethanol to breakdisulfide bonds of the insulin-Fc fusion homodimer), the apparent MW ofthe resulting insulin-Fc fusion protein monomer is compared against halfthe molecular weight of the insulin-Fc fusion protein homodimer as a wayof determining that the structural purity of the insulin-Fc fusionprotein is likely to be correct.

Example 6: Structure Confirmation by Non-Reducing and Reducing CE-SDS

Capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS) analysis isperformed in a LabChip® GXII (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Mass.) on asolution of a purified insulin-Fc fusion protein dissolved in 200 mMHEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaOAc, pH 7.0 buffer, and the electropherogramis plotted. Under non-reducing conditions, the sample is run againstknown molecular weight (MW) protein standards, and the eluting peakrepresents the ‘apparent’ MW of the insulin-Fc fusion protein homodimer.

Under reducing conditions (e.g., using beta-mercaptoethanol to breakdisulfide bonds of the insulin-Fc fusion homodimer), the apparent MW ofthe resulting insulin-Fc fusion protein monomer is compared against halfthe molecular weight of the insulin-Fc fusion protein homodimer as a wayof determining that the structural purity of the insulin-Fc fusionprotein is likely to be correct.

Example 7: Sequence Identification by LC-MS with Glycan Removal

To obtain an accurate estimate of the insulin-Fc mass via massspectroscopy (MS), the sample was first treated to remove naturallyoccurring glycan that might interfere with the MS analysis. 100 μL of a2.5 mg/mL insulin-Fc fusion protein dissolved in 200 mM HEPES, 100 mMNaCl, 50 mM NaOAc, pH 7.0 buffer solution was first buffer exchangedinto 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.0 buffer containing 5 mM EDTA using a Zebadesalting column (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.). 1.67μL of PNGase F enzyme (Prozyme N-glycanase) was added to this solutionto remove N-linked glycan present in the fusion protein (e.g., glycanlinked to the side chain of the asparagine located at the cNg-N site),and the mixture was incubated at 37° C. overnight in an incubator. Thesample was then analyzed via LC-MS (NovaBioassays, Woburn, Mass.)resulting in a molecular mass of the molecule which corresponds to thedesired homodimer without the glycan. This mass was then furthercorrected since the enzymatic process used to cleave the glycan from thecNg-asparagine also deaminates the asparagine side chain to form anaspartic acid, and in doing so the enzymatically treated homodimer gains2 Da overall, corresponding to a mass of 1 Da for each chain present inthe homodimer. Therefore, the actual molecular mass is the measured massminus 2 Da to correct for the enzymatic modification of the insulin-Fcfusion protein structure in the analytical sample.

Example 8: Sequence Identification by LC-MS with Glycan Removal

To obtain an accurate estimate of the insulin-Fc mass via massspectroscopy (MS), the sample is first treated to remove naturallyoccurring glycan that might interfere with the MS analysis. 100 μL of a2.5 mg/mL insulin-Fc fusion protein dissolved in 200 mM HEPES, 100 mMNaCl, 50 mM NaOAc, pH 7.0 buffer solution is first buffer exchanged into0.1 M Tris, pH 8.0 buffer containing 5 mM EDTA using a Zeba desaltingcolumn (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.). 1.67 μL ofPNGase F enzyme (Prozyme N-glycanase) is added to this solution toremove N-linked glycan present in the fusion protein (e.g., glycanlinked to the side chain of the asparagine located at the cNg-N site),and the mixture is incubated at 37° C. overnight in an incubator. Thesample is then analyzed via LC-MS (NovaBioassays, Woburn, Mass.)resulting in a molecular mass of the molecule which corresponds to thedesired homodimer without the glycan. This mass is then furthercorrected since the enzymatic process used to cleave the glycan from thecNg-asparagine also deaminates the asparagine side chain to form anaspartic acid, and in doing so the enzymatically treated homodimer gains2 Da overall, corresponding to a mass of 1 Da for each chain present inthe homodimer. Therefore, the actual molecular mass is the measured massminus 2 Da to correct for the enzymatic modification of the insulin-Fcfusion protein structure in the analytical sample.

Example 9: % Homodimer by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC-HPLC) of insulin-Fc fusion proteinswas carried out using a Waters 2795HT HPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford,Mass.) connected to a 2998 Photodiode array at a wavelength of 280 nm.100 μL or less of a sample containing an insulin-Fc fusion protein ofinterest was injected into a MAbPac SEC-1, 5 μm, 4×300 mm column(ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.) operating at a flow rate of0.2 mL/min and with a mobile phase comprising 50 mM sodium phosphate,300 mM NaCl, and 0.05% w/v sodium azide, pH 6.2. The MAbPac SEC-1 columnoperates on the principle of molecular size separation. Therefore,larger soluble insulin-Fc aggregates (e.g., multimers of insulin-Fcfusion protein homodimers) eluted at earlier retention times, and thenon-aggregated homodimers eluted at later retention times. In separatingthe mixture of homodimers from aggregated multimeric homodimers viaanalytical SEC-HPLC, the purity of the insulin-Fc fusion proteinsolution in terms of the percentage of non-aggregated homodimer wasascertained.

Example 10: % Homodimer by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC-HPLC) of insulin-Fc fusion proteinsis carried out using a Waters 2795HT HPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford,Mass.) connected to a 2998 Photodiode array at a wavelength of 280 nm.100 μL or less of a sample containing an insulin-Fc fusion protein ofinterest is injected into a MAbPac SEC-1, 5 μm, 4×300 mm column(ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.) operating at a flow rate of0.2 mL/min and with a mobile phase comprising 50 mM sodium phosphate,300 mM NaCl, and 0.05% w/v sodium azide, pH 6.2. The MAbPac SEC-1 columnoperates on the principle of molecular size separation. Therefore,larger soluble insulin-Fc aggregates (e.g., multimers of insulin-Fcfusion protein homodimers) elute at earlier retention times, and thenon-aggregated homodimers elute at later retention times. In separatingthe mixture of homodimers from aggregated multimeric homodimers viaanalytical SEC-HPLC, the purity of the insulin-Fc fusion proteinsolution in terms of the percentage of non-aggregated homodimer isascertained.

Example 11: In Vitro IM-9 Insulin Receptor Binding of an ExemplaryInsulin-Fc Fusion Protein at 4° C.

Human IM-9 cells (ATTC# CCL-159) that express human insulin receptorwere cultured and maintained in complete RPMI 5% FBS medium at 70-80%confluency. Cultures of IM-9 cells were centrifuged at 250×g (˜1000 rpm)for 10 min to pellet the cells. Cells were washed once with HBSS or PBSbuffer, resuspended in cold FACS staining medium (HBSS/2 mM EDTA/0.1%Na-azide+4% horse serum) to a concentration of 8×106 cells/mL and kepton ice or 4° C. until test solutions were made. The insulin-Fc proteinwas diluted in FACS buffer in 1:3 serial dilutions as 2× concentrationsin 1.2 mL tubes (approx. 60 μL volume of each dilution), and thesolutions were kept cold on ice until ready for pipetting.

Biotinylated-RHI was diluted in FACS staining medium to a concentrationof 1.25 μg/mL. 40 μL of the serially diluted test compound and 8 μL of1.25 μg/mL Biotin-RHI were added into each well of a V bottom microtiterplate, mixed by slow vortexing, and placed on ice. 40 μL of an IM-9 cellsuspension (8×106 cells/mL) was then added to each well by multichannelpipette, mixed again gently and incubated on ice for 30 min to allowcompetitive binding on the insulin receptor on IM-9 cells. Cells werethen washed twice with 2754, of ice-cold FACS wash buffer (HBSS/2 mMEDTA/0.1% Na-azide+0.5% horse serum) by centrifuging the V-bottom plateat 3000 rpm for 3 min and aspirating the supernatant. Cells were thenresuspended in 404, of FACS staining medium containing 1:100 dilutedStreptavidin-PE (Life Technologies) for 20 min on ice. Cells were thenwashed once with 275 μL of ice-cold FACS buffer and finally fixed with3% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temp. Cells were then washed oncewith 275 μL of ice-cold FACS buffer and resuspended in 250 μl of FACSbuffer for analysis.

The V-bottom plates containing cells were then analyzed on a Guava 8-HTflow cytometer (Millipore). Biotinylated-RHI binding to insulin receptorwas quantitated by the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the cellson the FACS FL-2 channel for each concentration of the test compound.Control wells were labeled only with biotinylated-RHI and were used tocalculate the percent (%) inhibition resulting from each test compoundconcentration. The % inhibition by test compounds of biotinylated-RHIbinding on IM-9 cells was plotted against log concentrations of the testcompound, and the resulting IC50 values were calculated using GraphPadPrism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, Calif.) for the test compounds.Lower IC50 values of the test compound therefore indicate greater levelsof biotinylated-RHI inhibition at lower concentrations indicatingstronger binding of the insulin-Fc fusion protein to the insulinreceptor. A control compound, such as unlabeled recombinant humaninsulin (RHI) was also used as an internal standard to generate an RHIIC50 against which a given compound IC50 could be ratioed(IC50(compound)/IC50(RHI)). Lower IC50 ratios have more similar bindingto RHI (stronger binding to insulin receptor), while higher IC50 ratioshave weaker binding to the insulin receptor relative to RHI.

Example 12: In Vitro Fc(Gamma) Receptor I Binding Affinity Assay

The binding of insulin-Fc fusion proteins to the Fc(gamma) receptor I atpH 7.4 was conducted using an ELISA assay as follows. Since canineFc(gamma) receptor I was not commercially available, human Fc(gamma)receptor I (i.e., rhFc(gamma) receptor I) was used as a surrogatemammalian receptor. Insulin-Fc compounds were diluted to 10 μg/mL insodium bicarbonate buffer at pH 9.6 and coated on Maxisorp (Nunc)microtiter plates overnight at 4° C., after which the microplate stripswere washed 5 times with PBST (PBS/0.05% Tween-20) buffer and blockedwith Superblock blocking reagent (ThermoFisher). Serial dilutions ofbiotinylated rhFc(gamma) receptor I (recombinant human Fc(gamma)R-I; R&DSystems) were prepared in PBST/10% Superblock buffer from 6000 ng/mL to8.2 ng/mL and loaded at 100 μL/well onto the microplate strips coatedwith insulin-Fc fusion protein. The microtiter plate was incubated for 1hour at room temperature after which the microplate strips were washed 5times with PBST and then loaded with 100 μL/well of streptavidin-HRPdiluted 1:10000 in PBST/10% Superblock buffer. After incubating for 45min, the microplate strips were washed again 5 times with PBST. TMB wasadded to reveal the bound Fc(gamma) receptor I proteins and stopped withELISA stop reagent (Boston Bioproducts). The plate was read in an ELISAplate reader at 450 nm, and the OD values (proportional to the bindingof rhFc(gamma) receptor I to insulin-Fc protein) were plotted againstlog concentrations of rhFc(gamma) receptor I added to each well togenerate binding curves using GraphPad Prism software.

Example 13: Generalized Procedure for Determination of In VivoPharmacodynamics (PD) after Single Administration of Insulin Fc-FusionProteins in Dogs

Insulin-Fc fusion proteins were assessed for their effects on fastingblood glucose levels as follows. N=1, 2, 3 or more healthy,antibody-naïve, dogs weighing approximately 10-15 kg were used, one foreach insulin-Fc fusion protein. Dogs were also observed twice daily forsigns of anaphylaxis, lethargy, distress, pain, etc., and, optionallyfor some compounds, treatment was continued for an additional threeweekly subcutaneous injections or more to observe if the glucoselowering capability of the compounds lessened over time, a key sign ofpotential induction of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies. On Day 0, thedogs received a single injection either via intravenous or subcutaneousadministration of a pharmaceutical composition containing an insulinFc-fusion protein homodimer at a concentration between 1 and 10 mg/mL ina solution of between 10-50 mM sodium hydrogen phosphate, 50-150 mMsodium chloride, 0.005-0.05% v/v Tween-80, and optionally a bacteriostat(e.g. phenol, m-cresol, or methylparaben) at a concentration of between0.02-1.00 mg/mL, at a solution pH of between 7.0-8.0, at a dose of0.08-0.80 mg insulin-Fc fusion protein/kg (or approximately equivalentto 1.2-12.3 nmol/kg or approximately equivalent to 0.4-4.0 U/kg insulinequivalent on molar basis). On Day 0, blood was collected from asuitable vein immediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120,240, 360, and 480 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days post injection.

For each time point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood was collected. Aglucose level reading was immediately determined using a glucose meter(ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which required approximately one drop of blood.Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) from Day 0 to Day 7 wereplotted to assess the bioactivity of a given insulin-Fc fusion protein.

Example 14: Generalized Procedure for Determination of In VivoPharmacodynamics (PD) after Single Administration of Insulin Fc-FusionProteins in Dogs

Insulin-Fc fusion proteins are assessed for their effects on fastingblood glucose levels as follows. N=1, 2, 3 or more healthy,antibody-naïve, dogs weighing approximately 10-15 kg are used, one foreach insulin-Fc fusion protein. Dogs are also observed twice daily forsigns of anaphylaxis, lethargy, distress, pain, etc., and, optionallyfor some compounds, treatment is continued for an additional threeweekly subcutaneous injections or more to observe if the glucoselowering capability of the compounds lessened over time, a key sign ofpotential induction of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies. On Day 0, thedogs receive a single injection either via intravenous or subcutaneousadministration of a pharmaceutical composition containing an insulinFc-fusion protein homodimer at a concentration between 1 and 10 mg/mL ina solution of between 10-50 mM sodium hydrogen phosphate, 50-150 mMsodium chloride, 0.005-0.05% v/v Tween-80, and optionally a bacteriostat(e.g. phenol, m-cresol, or methylparaben) at a concentration of between0.02-1.00 mg/mL, at a solution pH of between 7.0-8.0, at a dose of0.08-0.80 mg insulin-Fc fusion protein/kg (or approximately equivalentto 1.2-12.3 nmol/kg or approximately equivalent to 0.4-4.0 U/kg insulinequivalent on molar basis). On Day 0, blood is collected from a suitablevein immediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240,360, and 480 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days post injection.

For each time point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood is collected. Aglucose level reading is immediately determined using a glucose meter(ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which requires approximately one drop of blood.Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) from Day 0 to Day 7 areplotted to assess the bioactivity of a given insulin-Fc fusion protein.

Example 15: Generalized Procedure for Determination of In VivoPharmacodynamics (PD) after Repeated Administration of Insulin-Fc FusionProteins in Canines

Insulin-Fc fusion proteins were assessed for their effects on bloodglucose levels over repeated injections as follows. Healthy,antibody-naïve, dogs weighing approximately between 5 and 20 kg wereused, and each animal was administered doses of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein. Animals were observed twice daily for signs of anaphylaxis,lethargy, distress, pain, and other negative side effects, andoptionally for some compounds, treatment was continued for up to anadditional two to five subcutaneous injections to observe if the glucoselowering capability of the compounds decreased over time, indicating thepossible presence of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in vivo. On Day0, the animals received a single subcutaneous injection of apharmaceutical composition containing an insulin Fc-fusion protein in asolution of 10-50 mM sodium hydrogen phosphate, 50-150 mM sodiumchloride, 0.005-0.05% v/v Tween-80, and optionally a bacteriostat (e.g.phenol, m-cresol, or methylparaben) at a concentration of between0.02-1.00 mg/mL, at a solution pH of between 7.0-8.0, at a dose of0.08-0.80 mg insulin-Fc fusion protein/kg (or approximately equivalentto 1.2-12.3 nmol/kg or approximately equivalent to 0.4-4.0 U/kg insulinequivalent on molar basis). On Day 0, blood was collected from asuitable vein immediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120,240, 360, and 480 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days post injection.

Subsequent subcutaneous injections were given no more frequently thanonce-weekly, and in some cases the injections were given at differentintervals based on the pharmacodynamics of a given insulin-Fc fusionprotein formulation. Subsequent injections for each insulin-Fc fusionprotein were adjusted to higher or lower doses, depending on thedemonstrated pharmacodynamics of the insulin-Fc fusion protein. Forinstance, if the dose of a first injection on Day 0 was found to beineffective at lowering blood glucose, the subsequent dose levels ofinjected insulin-Fc fusion protein were adjusted upward. In a similarmanner, if the dose of a first injection on Day 0 was found to lowerglucose in too strong a manner, then subsequent dose levels of injectedinsulin-Fc fusion protein were adjusted downward. It was also found thatinterim doses or final doses could be adjusted in a similar manner asneeded. For each dose, blood was collected from a suitable vein justimmediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360, and480 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 days (and optionally 14 days) postinjection. For each time point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood wascollected. A glucose level reading was immediately determined using aglucose meter (ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which required approximately onedrop of blood. Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) fromthroughout the study were plotted against time which allows thebioactivity of a fusion protein to be determined.

To determine the bioactivity of each dose, an area-over-the-curve (AOC)analysis was conducted as follows. After constructing the % FBGL versustime data, the data was then entered into data analysis software(GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, San Diego Calif.). The software wasused to first conduct an area-under-the curve analysis (AUC) tointegrate the area under the % FBGL vs. time curve for each dose. Toconvert the AUC data into the desired AOC data, the following equationwas used: AOC=TPA−AUC; where TPA is the total possible area obtained bymultiplying each dose lifetime (e.g., 7 days, 14 days, etc.) by 100%(where 100% represents the y=100% of the % FBGL vs. time curve). Forexample, given a dose lifetime of 7 days and a calculated AUC of 500%FBGL·days, gives the following for AOC: AOC=(100% FBGL×7 days)−(500%FBGL·days)=200% FBGL·days. The analysis can be performed for eachinjected dose in a series of injected doses to obtain the AOC values forinjection 1, injection 2, injection 3, etc.

As the doses of insulin-Fc fusion protein may vary as previouslydiscussed, it is often more convenient to normalize all calculated AOCvalues for a given insulin-Fc fusion protein to a particular dose ofthat insulin-Fc fusion protein. Doing so allows for convenientcomparison of the glucose-lowering potency of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein across multiple injections, even if the dose levels changeacross the injections of a given study. Normalized AOC (NAOC) for agiven dose is calculated as follows: NAOC=AOC/D with units of %FBGL·days·kg/mg; where D is the actual dose injected into the animal inmg/kg. NAOC values may be calculated for each injection in a series ofinjections for a given animal and may be averaged across a group ofanimals receiving the same insulin-Fc fusion protein formulation.

The NAOC ratio (NAOCR) may also be calculated for each injection in aseries of injections for a given animal by taking the NAOC values foreach injection (e.g., injections 1, 2, 3 . . . N) and dividing each NAOCfor a given injection by the NAOC from injection 1 as follows:NAOCR=(NAOC(Nth injection)/NAOC(injection 1)). By evaluating the NAOCRof a given insulin-Fc homodimer fusion protein formulation for the Nthinjection in a series of injections, it is possible to determine whetherthe in vivo glucose lowering activity of a given insulin-Fc fusionprotein has substantially retained its bioactivity over a series of Ndoses (e.g., NAOCR for the Nth dose of greater than 0.5) or whether thein vivo glucose lowering activity of a given insulin-Fc fusion proteinhas lost a substantial portion of its potency (e.g., NAOCR of the Nthdose is less than 0.5) over a course of N doses, indicating thepotential formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in vivo. Inpreferred embodiments, the ratio of NAOC following the thirdsubcutaneous injection to the NAOC following the first subcutaneousinjection is greater than 0.5 (i.e., the NAOCR of the third subcutaneousinjection is greater than 0.5).

Example 16: Generalized Procedure for Determination of In VivoPharmacodynamics (PD) after Repeated Administration of Insulin-Fc FusionProteins in Canines

Insulin-Fc fusion proteins are assessed for their effects on bloodglucose levels over repeated injections as follows. Healthy,antibody-naïve, dogs weighing approximately between 5 and 20 kg areused, and each dog is administered doses of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein. Dogs are observed twice daily for signs of anaphylaxis,lethargy, distress, pain, and other negative side effects, andoptionally for some compounds, treatment is continued for up to anadditional two to five subcutaneous injections to observe if the glucoselowering capability of the compounds decreases over time, indicating thepossible presence of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in vivo. On Day0, the animals receive a single subcutaneous injection of apharmaceutical composition containing an insulin Fc-fusion protein in asolution of 10-50 mM sodium hydrogen phosphate, 50-150 mM sodiumchloride, 0.005-0.05% v/v Tween-80, and optionally a bacteriostat (e.g.phenol, m-cresol, or methylparaben) at a concentration of between0.02-1.00 mg/mL, at a solution pH of between 7.0-8.0, at a dose of0.08-0.80 mg insulin-Fc fusion protein/kg (or approximately equivalentto 1.2-12.3 nmol/kg or approximately equivalent to 0.4-4.0 U/kg insulinequivalent on molar basis). On Day 0, blood is collected from a suitablevein immediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240,360, and 480 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days post injection.

Subsequent subcutaneous injections are given no more frequently thanonce-weekly, and in some cases the injections are given at differentintervals based on the pharmacodynamics of a given insulin-Fc fusionprotein formulation. Subsequent injections for each insulin-Fc fusionprotein are adjusted to higher or lower doses, depending on thedemonstrated pharmacodynamics of the insulin-Fc fusion protein. Forinstance, if the dose of a first injection on Day 0 is found to beineffective at lowering blood glucose, the subsequent dose levels ofinjected insulin-Fc fusion protein are adjusted upward. In a similarmanner, if the dose of a first injection on Day 0 was found to lowerglucose in too strong a manner, then subsequent dose levels of injectedinsulin-Fc fusion protein are adjusted downward. Interim doses or finaldoses can be adjusted in a similar manner as needed. For each dose,blood is collected from a suitable vein just immediately prior toinjection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 min and at 1, 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 7 days (and optionally 14 days) post injection. For eachtime point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood is collected. A glucoselevel reading is immediately determined using a glucose meter(ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which requires approximately one drop of blood.Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) from throughout thestudy are plotted against time which allows the bioactivity of a fusionprotein to be determined.

To determine the bioactivity of each dose, an area-over-the-curve (AOC)analysis is conducted as follows. After constructing the % FBGL versustime data, the data is then entered into data analysis software(GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, San Diego Calif.). The software isused to first conduct an area-under-the curve analysis (AUC) tointegrate the area under the % FBGL vs. time curve for each dose. Toconvert the AUC data into the desired AOC data, the following equationis used: AOC=TPA−AUC; where TPA is the total possible area obtained bymultiplying each dose lifetime (e.g., 7 days, 14 days, etc.) by 100%(where 100% represents the y=100% of the % FBGL vs. time curve). Forexample, given a dose lifetime of 7 days and a calculated AUC of 500%FBGL·days, gives the following for AOC: AOC=(100% FBGL×7 days)−(500%FBGL·days)=200% FBGL·days. The analysis can be performed for eachinjected dose in a series of injected doses to obtain the AOC values forinjection 1, injection 2, injection 3, etc.

As the doses of insulin-Fc fusion protein may vary as previouslydiscussed, it is often more convenient to normalize all calculated AOCvalues for a given insulin-Fc fusion protein to a particular dose ofthat insulin-Fc fusion protein. Doing so allows for convenientcomparison of the glucose-lowering potency of an insulin-Fc fusionprotein across multiple injections, even if the dose levels changeacross the injections of a given study. Normalized AOC (NAOC) for agiven dose is calculated as follows: NAOC=AOC/D with units of %FBGL·days·kg/mg; where D is the actual dose injected into the animal inmg/kg. NAOC values may be calculated for each injection in a series ofinjections for a given animal and may be averaged across a group ofanimals receiving the same insulin-Fc fusion protein formulation.

The NAOC ratio (NAOCR) may also be calculated for each injection in aseries of injections for a given animal by taking the NAOC values foreach injection (e.g., injections 1, 2, 3 . . . N) and dividing each NAOCfor a given injection by the NAOC from injection 1 as follows:NAOCR=(NAOC(Nth injection)/NAOC(injection 1)). By evaluating the NAOCRof a given insulin-Fc homodimer fusion protein formulation for the Nthinjection in a series of injections, it is possible to determine whetherthe in vivo glucose lowering activity of a given insulin-Fc fusionprotein has substantially retained its bioactivity over a series of Ndoses (e.g., NAOCR for the Nth dose of greater than 0.5) or whether thein vivo glucose lowering activity of a given insulin-Fc fusion proteinhas lost a substantial portion of its potency (e.g., NAOCR of the Nthdose is less than 0.5) over a course of N doses, indicating thepotential formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in vivo. Inpreferred embodiments, the ratio of NAOC following the thirdsubcutaneous injection to the NAOC following the first subcutaneousinjection is greater than 0.5 (i.e., the NAOCR of the third subcutaneousinjection is greater than 0.5).

Example 17: Assay Protocol for Measuring Anti-Drug Antibodies in CanineSerum

Maxisorp ELISA Plates (Nunc) are coated with the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of interest diluted in coating buffer (pH=9.6Carbonate-Biocarbonate buffer) at 10 μg/mL overnight at 4° C. formeasuring ADAs against the test compound. For measuring ADAs against theinsulin portion of the insulin-Fc fusion protein containing an Fcfragment of canine IgG origin, plates are coated with purified insulinat 30 μg/mL in coating buffer. Plates are then washed 5× with PB ST(PBS+0.05% Tween 20) and blocked for at least 1 hour (or overnight) withSuperBlock blocking solution (ThermoFisher, Waltham Mass.). Forcalculating the ADAs in canine IgG units, strips are directly coatedwith 1:2 serial dilutions of canine IgG (Jackson ImmunoresearchLaboratories, West Grove Pa.) in pH=9.6 Carb-Biocarb coating buffer atconcentrations between 300-4.69 ng/ml overnight at 4° C. and used tocreate a 7-point pseudo-standard curve. The standards strip plates arealso washed and blocked with SuperBlock blocking solution for at least 1hour (or overnight).

Test serum samples are diluted to greater than or equal to 1:100(typically tested as 1:200) in PBST/SB/20% HS sample dilution buffer(PBS+0.1% Tween 20+10% SuperBlock+20% horse serum) and added to theinsulin-Fc fusion protein coated (or RHI coated) strips at 100 μL/wellin duplicate. Duplicate strips of canine IgG coated standard strips arealso added to each plate and filled with PBST/SB (PBS+0.1% Tween 20+10%SuperBlock) buffer at 100 μL/well. Plates are incubated for 1 hour at RTand then washed 5× with PBST. For detection of ADAs, HRP-conjugated Goatanti-feline IgG F(ab′)2 (anti-feline IgG F(ab′)2 reagent iscross-reacted to canine antibodies; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories,West Grove Pa.), which is diluted in PBST/SB to 1:10000 and added at 100μL/well to both sample and standard wells and incubated for 45 minutesat RT in dark. Plates are washed 5× with PBST and then one time withdeionized water and then developed by adding 100 μL/well TMB substrate(Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham Mass.) for 15-20 minutesat room temperature in the dark. Color development is then stopped byaddition of 100 μL/well of ELISA Stop Solution (Boston Bioproducts) andthe absorbance is read at 450 nm using a SpectraMax plate reader within30 minutes. The anti-drug antibody concentration is determined byinterpolating the OD values in the 4-PL pseudo-standard curve usingSoftMax Pro Software (Molecular Devices, San Jose Calif.).

To demonstrate the specificity of the detected ADAs, an “inhibition”assay is carried out. In the drug inhibition ADA assay, serum samplesare diluted 1:100 in PBST/SB/20% HS buffer and mixed with an equalvolume of 300 μg/mL of the relevant therapeutic compound (final sampledilution at 1:200 and final inhibitory compound at 150 μg/mL) andincubated for 30-40 minutes at room temperature to allow anti-drugantibodies to bind the free inhibitor (i.e., the therapeutic compound).After pre-incubation, the samples are added to insulin-Fc fusion proteincoated (or RHI coated) strips at 100 μL/well in duplicate. Samplesdiluted 1:200 in PBST/SB/20% HS buffer without the inhibitory compoundare also tested in the sample plates along with duplicate strips ofcanine IgG coated standards. Remaining steps of the assay procedure arecarried out as described above. The ADAs measured in the drug-inhibitedwells are matched with the non-inhibited ADA concentrations to assessthe specificity of the ADAs. If significant inhibition of ADA signals isobserved in the drug-inhibited wells, this means the ADAs are specificto the therapeutic compound.

Example 18: Assay Procedure for Immunogenic Epitope Identification

Maxisorp ELISA microplates (Nunc) are coated with a library ofinsulin-Fc fusion protein homodimer compounds with known amino acidsequences, and the coated plates are blocked in a similar manner asdescribed in the anti-drug antibody ELISA assay Example 17, except thateach compound in the library is coated on a separate individual strip ofELISA microplate wells. The compounds in the library comprise a range ofinsulin-Fc fusion proteins with different insulin polypeptide amino acidcompositions, including various B-chain, C-chain, and A-chain amino acidmutations, different linker compositions, and different Fc fragmentcompositions, including some of human origin. Separately, some platestrip wells are directly coated with 1:2 serial dilutions of canine IgG(Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove Pa.) for calculatingthe anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in canine IgG units, respectively, asdescribed in Example 17.

Serum obtained from individual dogs receiving repeated doses of aninsulin-Fc fusion protein is first screened on the anti-drug antibodyELISA assay (Example 17). Serum samples demonstrating moderate or highpositivity (e.g., moderate, or high titers of antibodies) on the assayof Example 17 are serially diluted (1:200 to 1:8000) in PBST/SB/20% HSsample dilution buffer (PBS+0.1% Tween 20+10% SuperBlock+20% horseserum) and added to the plates coated with the library of insulin-Fcfusion protein compounds for 1 hour at RT. Following incubation, theplates are washed 5 times with PBST. For detection of canine antibodiescapable of cross-reacting to the coated compound library, HRP conjugatedgoat anti-feline IgG F(ab′)2 (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, WestGrove Pa.), which is cross-reactive to canine IgGs, is diluted inPBST/SB to 1:10000 and added at 100 μL/well to both sample and standardwells and incubated for 45 min at RT in the dark. Plates are washed 5times with PBST, once with deionized water, and developed by the adding100 μL/well TMB substrate (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, WalthamMass.) for 15-20 min at RT in the dark. Color development is thenstopped by addition of 100 μL/well of ELISA Stop Solution (BostonBioproducts, Ashland Mass.) and absorbance is read at 450 nm using aSpectraMax plate reader within 30 min. Anti-compound cross-reactiveantibody concentrations present in the serum samples are determined byinterpolating the OD values in the 4-PL pseudo-standard curve againstthe directly coated canine IgG antibody controls using SoftMax ProSoftware (Molecular Devices, San Jose Calif.).

By correlating the resulting antibody concentrations from the assay withthe known amino acid compositions of the coated insulin-Fc fusionprotein library, one can determine whether particular amino acidmutations or epitopes are responsible for causing none, some, most, orall of the total antibody signal on the assay, indicating no binding,weak binding, or strong binding to various insulin-Fc fusion proteinhomodimers. The mutations or epitopes responsible for moderate or strongbinding are herein referred to as immunogenic “hot spots”.

Example 19: Design Process for Obtaining Insulin-Fc Fusion Proteins withHigh Homodimer Titers and Acceptable Levels of Acute and Repeated DoseBioactivity in the Target Species

The process for meeting the design goals described in the DetailedDescription of the Invention comprised the following steps. First, theinsulin polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 4 or SEQ ID NO: 5 was combined with aspecies-specific Fc fragment of a particular IgG isotype and a linkersuch that the resulting insulin-Fc fusion protein was most likely toyield a long-acting bioactivity product with minimal immunogenicity(e.g., a species-specific IgG isotype was chosen with minimalFc(gamma)receptor I binding). The DNA sequence coding for the desiredfusion protein was prepared, cloned into a vector (LakePharma, SanCarlos, Calif.), and the vector was then used to transiently transfectHEK cells according to the procedure described in Example 1. Theinsulin-Fc fusion protein was then purified according to Examples 3 andthe overall protein yield and % homodimer measured according to Example9. Only candidates with a homodimer titer of greater than 40 mg/L wereconsidered acceptable, because titers less than this level are notlikely to result in commercial production titers that meet thestringently low manufacturing cost requirements for veterinary products.Selected insulin-Fc fusion proteins were then screened for indicators ofbioactivity through in vitro insulin receptor binding studies asdescribed in Example 11. Based on experience, only compounds thatexhibited IR activity IC50 values less than 5000 nM were deemed likelyto exhibit bioactivity in the target species. Although the in vitro IRIC50 value is a useful qualitative screening tool, it utilizes humanIM-9 cells which express the human insulin receptor and therefore it maynot capture some of the small differences in affinity between the canineIR and the human IR. Furthermore, factors other than insulin receptorbinding may influence a compound's bioactivity in vivo (e.g., affinityfor canine FcRn to allow for extended pharmacokinetic eliminationhalf-lives in vivo). Therefore, selected insulin-Fc fusion proteins thatwere acceptable from a manufacturing and IR activity IC50 valuestandpoint were further screened for bioactivity in the animal ofinterest (e.g., dog or cat) to screen out any materials with less thanthe desired potency and/or duration of bioactivity (e.g., NAOC of lessthan 150% FBGL·days·kg/mg). Again, based on experience, at NAOC valuesof greater than 150% FBGL·days·kg/mg, the dose requirements in thetarget species will be sufficiently low to reach an acceptable treatmentcost. Lastly, an additional evaluation criterion was added which ismentioned rarely if ever in the art. As discussed in more detail in theExamples below, many insulin-Fc fusion protein embodiments that exhibitacceptable NAOC levels in the target species after the first dose,unexpectedly fail to maintain that level of bioactivity after repeateddoses. Furthermore, in most cases the reduction in repeated dosebioactivity in the target species is correlated with the development ofneutralizing anti-drug antibodies. This propensity to generate anti-drugantibodies and the failure to maintain activity render such insulin-Fcfusion proteins impractical for use in treating a chronic disease suchas canine diabetes. Therefore, only the insulin-Fc fusions proteinsexhibiting acceptable levels of repeated dose bioactivity (e.g., NAOCRvalues greater than 0.50 for the third dose relative to the first dose)with minimal levels of anti-drug antibodies were deemed acceptable foruse in the present invention.

Results—Insulin-Fc Fusion Proteins Comprising a Canine Fc FragmentExample 20: Canine Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Configurations Comprisingthe Canine Fc IgGA, IgGC and IgGD Isotypes

An attempt was made to produce insulin-Fc fusion proteins comprising theinsulin polypeptide sequences of SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO:7, and SEQ ID NO: 6, and the Fc fragment of the canine IgGA isotype (SEQID NO: 11), the canine IgGC isotype (SEQ ID NO: 13) or the canine IgGDisotype (SEQ ID NO: 14) using the peptide linker of SEQ ID NO: 10 or SEQID NO: 9. The full amino acid sequences for the resulting insulin-Fcfusion protein configurations are as follows:

(SEQ ID NO: 22) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGRCTDTPPCPVPEPLGGPSVLIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEVTCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQSREQQFNGTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIDLPSPIERTISKARGRAHKPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVSITCLIKDFYPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPERKHRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDPFTCAVMHETLQNHYTDLSLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 23)FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGRCTDTPPCPVPEPLGGPSVLIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEVTCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQSREQQFNGTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIDLPSPIERTISKARGRAHKPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVSITCLIKDFYPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPERKHRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDPFTCAVMHETLQNHYTDLSLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 24)FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKAGGGPRRGIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGRCTDTPPCPVPEPLGGPSVLIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEVTCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQSREQQFNGTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIDLPSPIERTISKARGRAHKPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVSITCLIKDFYPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPERKHRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDPFTCAVMHETLQNHYTDLSLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 25)FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKAAAAAAAKGIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGRCTDTPPCPVPEPLGGPSVLIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEVTCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQSREQQFNGTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIDLPSPIERTISKARGRAHKPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVSITCLIKDFYPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPERKHRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDPFTCAVMHETLQNHYTDLSLSHSPG

FIG. 3 illustrates a side-by-side sequence comparison of SEQ ID NO: 22,SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24 and SEQ ID NO: 25. “*” represents completehomology across all sequences at a given sequence position, while “:”,“.” or spaces refer to conservative, moderate, or very different aminoacid mutations across the sequences at a given sequence position,respectively.

The insulin-Fc fusion protein configuration of SEQ ID NO: 27, comprisingthe insulin polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5, the peptide linker of SEQ IDNO: 9 and the canine IgGC Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO: 13 yielded nomaterial at all. The insulin-Fc fusion protein configuration of SEQ IDNO: 28, comprising the insulin polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5, the peptidelinker of SEQ ID NO: 9 and the canine IgGD Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO: 14yielded a good protein yield of 134 mg/L, however the material washighly aggregated with a % homodimer of 12.3% and a homodimer titer of16.5 mg/L, which is significantly less than the required homodimer titerof 40 mg/L.

(SEQ ID NO : 27) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGCNNCPCPGCGLLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDILVTARTPTVTCVVVDLDPENPEVQISWFVDSKQVQTANTQPREEQSNGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLSGKQFKCKVNNKALPSPIEEIISKTPGQAHQPNVYVLPPSRDEMSKNTVTLTCLVKDFFPPEIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRMTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQISLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 28)FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGCISPCPVPESLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDILRITRTPEITCVVLDLGREDPEVQISWFVDGKEVHTAKTQPREQQFNSTYRVVSVLPIEHQDWLTGKEFKCRVNHIGLPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSPKELSSSDTVTLTCLIKDFFPPEIDVEWQSNGQPEPESKYHTTAPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQQGDTFTCAVMHEALQNHYTDLSLSHSPG

The insulin-Fc fusion protein configurations of SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ IDNO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 25, SEQ ID NO: 27 and SEQ ID NO: 28were synthesized in HEK cells according to Example 1 and purifiedaccording to Example 3. The structure of the insulin-Fc fusion proteinwas confirmed according to Example 5 by non-reducing and reducingCE-SDS, and the sequence was further identified by LC-MS with glycanremoval according to Example 7. The % homodimer was measured bysize-exclusion chromatography according to Example 9. The results aregiven in Table 1. In summary, despite mutating the insulin polypeptideand/or the linker, there was no embodiment based on the canine IgGA Fcfragment (SEQ ID NO: 11) with a low enough degree of aggregation and ahigh enough titer of the desired homodimer.

TABLE 1 Homodimer Titers for Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein ConfigurationsUtilizing Canine IgG Fc Fragments Protein Homodimer Canine Yield % TiterSEQ ID NO: IgG (mg/L) Homodimer (mg/L) SEQ ID NO: 22 IgGA 22 24% 5.28SEQ ID NO: 23 IgGA 21 19% 3.99 SEQ ID NO: 24 IgGA 11 Not tested ≤11 SEQID NO: 25 IgGA 18 Not tested ≤18 SEQ ID NO: 27 IgGC 0 Not tested 0 SEQID NO: 28 IgGD 134 12% 16.5

Example 21: Canine Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Configurations Comprisingthe Canine Fc IgGB Isotype

On the other hand, replacing the canine IgGA Fc fragment (SEQ ID NO: 11)with the canine IgGB Fc fragment (SEQ ID NO: 12) yielded a much lessaggregated compound with a comparatively high titer of the desiredhomodimer. The insulin-Fc fusion protein configuration of SEQ ID NO: 26,comprising the insulin polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5, the linker of SEQ IDNO: 9 and the canine IgGB Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO: 12 had a proteinyield of 80 mg/L and a % homodimer of 93% resulting in a homodimer titerof 74.7 mg/L, which surpassed the required homodimer titer of 40 mg/L.

(SEQ ID NO: 26) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGDCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFNGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG

Example 22: In Vitro IM-9 Insulin Receptor Binding of an ExemplaryInsulin-Fc Fusion Protein at 4° C.

In vitro insulin receptor binding for the insulin-Fc fusion proteinconfigurations of SEQ ID NO: 22 (IgGA), SEQ ID NO: 26 (IgGB), SEQ ID NO:27 (IgGC) and SEQ ID NO: 28 (IgGD) were tested according to theprocedure of Example 11. As shown in Table 2, the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 22 demonstrated in IR binding IC50 of 2733 and theinsulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 28 demonstrated an IR bindingIC50 of greater than 5000 nM, indicating that neither insulin-Fc fusionprotein configuration was highly unlikely to show bioactivity in vivo.The insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 27 had no yield and so theIR binding IC50 was not measure. However, the insulin-Fc fusion proteinof SEQ ID NO: 26 demonstrated an IC50 of 28 nM indicating that thissequence was likely to be bioactive in vivo.

TABLE 2 Homodimer Titers for Sequences Utilizing Native Canine IgGA,IgGB, IgGC, and IgGD Fc Fragments Homo- IR Protein % dimer Binding, IgGYield Homo- Titer IC50 SEQ ID NO: Fragment (mg/L) dimer (mg/L) (nM) SEQID NO: 22 IgGA 22 24% 5.28 2,733 SEQ ID NO: 26 IgGB 80 93% 74.4 28 SEQID NO: 27 IgGC 0 Not tested 0 DNM* SEQ ID NO: 28 IgGD 134 12% 16.5 >5000*DNM = Did Not Measure

Example 23: In Vivo Efficacy of an Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Comprisingthe Insulin Polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5 with a Canine IgGB Isotype FcFragment

Given the promising homodimer titer and insulin receptor activityresults in Examples 21 and 22, the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ IDNO: 26 was tested for in vivo bioactivity according to Example 13following an intravenous injection in each of N=3 healthy,antibody-naïve, beagle dogs weighing approximately 10 kg. In a separateexperiment, the compound was administered subcutaneously to N=3 naïvebeagle dogs. FIG. 5 shows the % FBGL versus time for a singleintravenous administration of the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ IDNO: 26, and FIG. 6 shows the % FBGL vs. time for a single subcutaneousadministration of the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26, bothof which demonstrate that the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26is significantly bioactive in dogs.

The NAOC was calculated according to the procedure of Example 15 todetermine the relative bioactivity and duration of action of theinsulin-Fc fusion protein. The NAOC of the insulin-Fc fusion protein ofSEQ ID NO: 26 injected intravenously was 399% FBGL·days·kg/mg which was3.8 times the NAOC of the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 22injected intravenously, illustrating significantly increased bioactivityfor the insulin-Fc fusion protein comprising the canine IgGB Fc fragmentversus the insulin-Fc fusion protein comprising the canine IgGA Fcfragment. The in vivo bioactivity of SEQ ID NO: 22 is illustrated inFIG. 2. The NAOC of the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26injected subcutaneously was 366% FBGL·days·kg/mg, demonstrating a levelof bioactivity via subcutaneous administration that is like thatobtained via intravenous administration. The in vivo bioactivity of SEQID NO: 26 across two doses is illustrated in FIG. 8.

Example 24: In Vivo Immunogenicity Screening after Repeated SubcutaneousDoses of the Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Comprising the InsulinPolypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 26 with a Canine IgGB Isotype Fc Fragment

Next, the repeated dose subcutaneous bioactivity of the insulin-Fcfusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26 was tested in dogs as per the methoddescribed in Example 15. N=3 animals were dosed subcutaneously at Day 0,at Day 35, and at Day 42, and the % FBGL was measured for the 7-daywindow after each dose according to Example 15. The NAOC and NAOCR werecalculated according to the procedure of Example 15 for each repeatedsubcutaneous injection. As illustrated in Table 3, repeated subcutaneousdosing in dogs unexpectedly revealed a significant decay in bioactivityby the third dose as measured by a significant decrease in the NAOCR(i.e., the NAOC for the third injection was only 0.40, or 40%, of theNAOC for the first injection).

TABLE 3 NAOC per Dose and NAOCR for Repeated Doses of SEQ ID NO: 26Injection Number of NAOC NAOCR SEQ ID NO: 26 (% FBGL · days · kg/mg)(ratioed to Week 1) 1 330 1.0 2 339 1.1 3 115 0.4

Without being bound to any particular explanation, it was postulatedthat the cause of the significant reduction in bioactivity of theinsulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26 after the third repeatedsubcutaneous dose in dogs was due to the development of anti-drugantibodies that neutralized its biological activity. Anti-drugantibodies may be directed against the insulin polypeptide, linker, orFc-fragment portions of an insulin-Fc fusion protein. The immunogenicresponse manifests as interactions between antigen presenting cells,T-helper cells, B-cells, and their associated cytokines, which may leadto the production of endogenous antibodies against the drug (e.g.,anti-drug antibodies). Binding antibodies are all isotypes capable ofbinding the insulin-Fc fusion protein, and these may be detected in animmunoassay as described in Example 17. Neutralizing antibodies thatinhibit functional activity of the insulin-Fc fusion protein aregenerally directed against an epitope that is required for bioactivity.To assess whether this was the case, serum that was collected prior tothe administration of each dose and at the end of the experimentdescribed in Examples 11 was tested to quantify the levels of anti-drugantibodies according to Example 17. As shown in FIG. 7, levels ofanti-drug antibodies did indeed increase with multiple subcutaneousadministrations of the compound, indicating that the generation ofneutralizing anti-drug antibodies were the likely cause for thereduction in the NAOCR after the third injection of the insulinFc-fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26.

Example 25: Non-Glycosylated Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Comprising theInsulin Polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5 with Canine IgGB Isotype FcFragments to Reduce the Potential Risk of Immunogenicity

As shown in Example 21, Example 22 and Example 23, the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 26 showed acceptable % homodimer content,homodimer titer, and bioactivity in dogs; however, its use for a chronicdisease such as diabetes is compromised by the reduction in bioactivityand generation of anti-drug antibodies (Example 24) with repeatedsubcutaneous dosing. Without being bound to any particular theory, onepossible cause of the generation of anti-drug antibodies and thereduction in bioactivity is the increased interaction of the canine IgGBFc fragment with various receptors of the canine immune system (e.g.,Fc(gamma) receptors, e.g., Fc(gamma)RI). Nevertheless, the canine IgGBisotype was the only one of the four canine IgG isotypes that, when usedfor the Fc fragment, resulted in an insulin-Fc fusion protein meetingthe manufacturability and single-dose bioactivity design goals (Example19). As described in the Detailed Description of the Invention, onemethod for reducing the Fc(gamma) interaction involves mutating the Fcfragment cNg site to prevent glycosylation during synthesis in the hostcell.

Therefore, cNg site mutations were made to the Fc fragment region of SEQID NO: 26 to reduce the binding affinity of the Fc fragment forFc(gamma) receptors in vivo, as measured by binding in an in vitro humanFc(gamma)RI assay described in Example 12. Verification of the lack ofglycan were performed using the LC-MS method of Example 7, but withomission of the PNGase F treatment step. The position of the cNg site inthe insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26 is cNg-NB139. Mutationsto SEQ ID NO: 26 included SEQ ID NO: 29 comprising a mutation ofcNg-NB139-S, SEQ ID NO: 30 comprising a mutation of cNg-NB139-Q togetherwith reverting to the native B10H and A8T, and SEQ ID NO: 31 comprisingremoval of the aspartic acid at the N-terminus of the Fc fragment (deshinge D) a mutation of cNg-NB138-K (due to the des hinge D mutation, thecNg site for SEQ ID NO: 31 is NB138 instead of NB139). The full aminoacid sequences of the cNg-mutated insulin-Fc fusion proteins are listedbelow (with the cNg position in bold).

(SEQ ID NO: 29) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGDCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFSGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 30)FVNQHLCGSHLVEALALVCGERGFEYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCTSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGDCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFQGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG (SEQ ID NO: 31)FVNQHLCGSDLVEALALVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGAGGGGCPKCPAPEMLGGPSVFIFPPKPKDTLLIARTPEVTCVVVDLDPEDPEVQISWFVDGKQMQTAKTQPREEQFKGTYRVVSVLPIGHQDWLKGKQFTCKVNNKALPSPIERTISKARGQAHQPSVYVLPPSREELSKNTVSLTCLIKDFFPPDIDVEWQSNGQQEPESKYRTTPPQLDEDGSYFLYSKLSVDKSRWQRGDTFICAVMHEALHNHYTQESLSHSPG

The insulin-Fc fusion proteins were manufactured in HEK293 cellsaccording to Example 1 and purified using a Protein A column accordingto Example 3. The structures of the insulin-Fc fusion proteins wereconfirmed according to Example 5 by non-reducing and reducing CE-SDS,and the sequences were further identified by LC-MS with glycan removalaccording to Example 7. The % homodimer was measured by size-exclusionchromatography according to Example 9. As shown in Table 4, thehomodimer titers of the insulin-Fc fusion proteins of SEQ ID NO: 29, SEQID NO: 30 and SEQ ID NO: 31 met the design goal for homodimer titer.

Example 26: Screening of Canine Serum Containing Anti-Drug Antibodiesand Identification of Potential Immunogenic Epitopes at the B10D and A8HPositions of the Insulin Polypeptide

It was hypothesized, therefore, that the insulin polypeptide of SEQ IDNO: 5 may unexpectedly contain specific epitopes (i.e., immunogenic “hotspots”) against which the dog's immune system is directed. Therefore,the binding specificity of the antibodies present in the serum samplesdescribed in Example 17 were evaluated according to the generalprocedure of Example 18. The analysis of the antibody-containing serumsamples from the repeated dosing of the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQID NO: 26 (Example 24) against the coated insulin-Fc fusion proteinlibrary demonstrated that there were unexpectedly two primary “hotspots” present within the insulin polypeptide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5:the aspartic acid mutation at the 10th position from the N-terminus ofthe B-chain (i.e., B10), and, separately, the histidine mutation at the8th position from the N-terminal end of the A-chain (i.e., A8). Theresults suggest that insulin-Fc fusion proteins comprising insulinpolypeptide amino acid compositions containing these two particularamino acid mutations are likely to be immunogenic in dogs and thereforelikely to give rise to anti-drug antibodies that neutralize thebioactivity after repeated injections. The insulin-Fc fusion proteinconfigurations of SEQ ID NO: 29 and SEQ ID NO: 31 however met the designrequirements for IR binding IC50, while the insulin-Fc fusion proteinconfiguration of SEQ ID NO: 30 (where the B10D and A8H mutations wererestored to the native B10H and A8T) demonstrated an IR binding IC50or >5000 nM, indicating that this insulin-Fc fusion proteinconfiguration was highly unlikely to be bioactive in vivo. Thisindicated that the B10H and A8T mutations in these insulin-Fc fusionprotein configurations appeared to be necessary to achieve in vivobioactivity.

TABLE 4 Homodimer Titers and IR Binding for Insulin-Fc Fusion ProteinConfigurations Utilizing Canine IgGB Fc with cNg Mutations Homo- IR cNgProtein % dimer Binding, MUTA- Yield Homo- Titer IC50 SEQ ID NO: TION(mg/L) dimer (mg/L) (nM) SEQ ID NO: 29 S 76.7 98.3% 75.4 145 SEQ ID NO:30 Q 21.4 98.7% 21.1 >5000 SEQ ID NO: 31 K 45.4 98.1% 44.5 147

Example 27: Evaluation of In vivo Bioactivity and Immunogenicity ofNon-Glycosylated Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Configurations of with cNgMutations of the Canine IgGB Isotype Fc Fragment

To determine if the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 29,containing the cNg-S mutation, improved the repeated dose bioactivityperformance in dogs, the compound was administered subcutaneously to N=1dog on Day 0, Day 14, Day 21 and on Day 28 according to the procedure ofExample 15. The % FBGL across these doses for SEQ ID NO: 29 isillustrated in FIG. 9. When the dog's % FBGL dropped too low, the dogwas given food to raise the blood glucose to a safe level. The NAOC forthe first injection measured over the first 7 days following theinjection was 403% FBGL·days·kg/mg, showing that the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 29 was satisfactorily bioactive in vivo. The NAOCand NAOCR were also measured for each subsequent dose according to thegeneral procedure of Example 15, calculated from the time the dose wasadministered until just before the next dose was administered. The NAOCand the NAOCR shown in Table 5 illustrate that the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 29 exhibited an NAOCR that decreased significantlyon doses 2 and 3 of a three dose regimen. Therefore, the insulin-Fcfusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 29, containing the cNg-S mutation, wasunable to demonstrate repeated dose bioactivity in dogs.

TABLE 5 NAOC per Dose for Repeated Doses of SEQ ID NO: 29 InjectionNumber of NAOC SEQ ID NO: 29 (% FBGL · days · kg/mg) NAOCR 1 403 1.0 2508 0.3 3 128 0.32

To determine if the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 30,containing the cNg-Q mutation, improved the repeated dose bioactivityperformance in dogs, the compound was administered subcutaneously to N=1dog on Day 0 and on Day 28 according to the procedure of Example 15. The% FBGL across these doses for SEQ ID NO: 30 is illustrated in FIG. 10.When the dog's % FBGL dropped too low, the dog was given food to raisethe blood glucose to a safe level. The NAOC for the first injectionmeasured over the first 7 days following the injection was 24.2%FBGL·days·kg/mg, showing that the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ IDNO: 30 did not show satisfactory bioactive in vivo. The NAOC and NAOCRwere also measured for the subsequent dose according to the generalprocedure of Example 15, calculated from the time the dose wasadministered until just before the next dose was administered. The NAOCand the NAOCR shown in Table 6 illustrate that the insulin-Fc fusionprotein of SEQ ID NO: 30 exhibited 0 NAOC and NAOCR for the second dose.Therefore, the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 30, containingthe cNg-Q mutation, was unable to demonstrate repeated dose bioactivityin dogs.

TABLE 6 NAOC per Dose for Repeated Doses of SEQ ID NO: 30 InjectionNumber of NAOC SEQ ID NO: 30 (% FBGL · days · kg/mg) NAOCR 1 403 1.0 2 00.0

To determine if the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 31,containing the cNg-K mutation together with the des hinge D omission(the Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO: 16) improved the repeated dosebioactivity performance in dogs, the compound was administeredsubcutaneously to N=1 dog on Day 0, Day 7, and Day 14 according to theprocedure of Example 15. The % FBGL across these doses for SEQ ID NO: 31is illustrated in FIG. 11. When the dog's % FBGL dropped too low, thedog was given food to raise the blood glucose to a safe level. The NAOCfor the first injection was 178% FBGL·days·kg/mg, showing that theinsulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 31 was satisfactorily bioactivein vivo. The NAOC and NAOCR were also measured for each subsequent doseaccording to the general procedure of Example 15, calculated from thetime the dose was administered until just before the next dose wasadministered. The NAOC and the NAOCR shown in Table 7 illustrate thatthe insulin-Fc fusion protein configuration of SEQ ID NO: 31 maintainsan NAOCR greater than 0.6 throughout the three doses. Therefore,unexpectedly, the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 31, containingthe cNg-K mutation with des hinge D, was the only non-glycosylatedmutant of the insulin-Fc fusion protein of SEQ ID NO: 26 resulting insignificantly improved repeated dose bioactivity in dogs.

TABLE 7 NAOC per Dose for Repeated Doses of SEQ ID NO: 31 InjectionNumber of NAOC SEQ ID NO: 31 (% FBGL · days · kg/mg) NAOCR 1 178 1.0 2382 2.2 3 238 1.3

Example 28: In Vivo Pharmacodynamics (PD) after a Single Administrationof an Insulin Fc-Fusion Protein in Felines

A bioactive insulin-Fc fusion homodimer construct of SEQ ID NO: 32 wassynthesized according to Example 1 and was assessed for its effects onfasting blood glucose levels as follows. N=3 healthy, antibody-naïve,cats weighing approximately 5 kg were used. On Day 0, the cats receiveda single injection of a pharmaceutical composition containing an insulinFc-fusion protein homodimer of SEQ ID NO: 32 in a solution of 50 mMsodium hydrogen phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, and 0.02% v/vTween-80 at pH 7.5, at a dose of 6 nmol/kg (equivalent to 0.39 mg Fcfusion protein/kg or 1.9 U/kg insulin equivalent on molar basis). On Day0 immediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360,and 480 minutes and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 days post injectionblood was collected from a suitable vein.

For each time point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood was collected. Aglucose level reading was immediately determined using a glucose meter(ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which requires approximately one drop of blood.Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) from Day 0 to Day 8 wereplotted in FIG. 12, which allows the bioactivity of a fusion protein tobe determined. FIG. 12 demonstrates that the homodimer of the SEQ ID NO:32 can lower blood glucose for a significant period of time on a singledose.

Example 29: In Vivo Pharmacodynamics (PD) after a Single Administrationof an Insulin Fc-Fusion Protein in Felines

A bioactive insulin-Fc fusion homodimer construct of SEQ ID NO: 32 wassynthesized according to Example 1 and was assessed for its effects onfasting blood glucose levels as follows. N=3 healthy, antibody-naïve,cats weighing approximately 5 kg were used. On Day 0, the cats receiveda single injection of a pharmaceutical composition containing an insulinFc-fusion protein homodimer of SEQ ID NO: 32 in a solution of 50 mMsodium hydrogen phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, and 0.02% v/vTween-80 at pH 7.5, at a dose of 6 nmol/kg (equivalent to 0.39 mg Fcfusion protein/kg or 1.9 U/kg insulin equivalent on molar basis). On Day0 immediately prior to injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360,and 480 minutes and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 days post injectionblood was collected from a suitable vein.

For each time point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood was collected. Aglucose level reading was immediately determined using a glucose meter(ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which requires approximately one drop of blood.Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) from Day 0 to Day 8 wereplotted in FIG. 12, which allows the bioactivity of a fusion protein tobe determined. FIG. 12 demonstrates that the homodimer of the SEQ ID NO:32 can lower blood glucose for a significant period of time on a singledose.

Example 29: In Vivo Pharmacodynamics (PD) after a Single Administrationof an Insulin Fc-Fusion Protein in Felines

A bioactive insulin-Fc fusion homodimer construct is synthesizedaccording to Example 1 and is assessed for its effects on fasting bloodglucose levels as follows. Healthy, antibody-naïve, cats weighingapproximately 5 kg are used. On Day 0, the cats receive a singleinjection of a pharmaceutical composition containing an insulinFc-fusion protein homodimer in a solution of 50 mM sodium hydrogenphosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, and 0.02% v/v Tween-80 at pH 7.5, ata dose of 6 nmol/kg (equivalent to 0.39 mg Fc fusion protein/kg or 1.9U/kg insulin equivalent on molar basis). On Day 0 immediately prior toinjection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 minutes and at1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 days post injection blood was collected froma suitable vein.

For each time point, a minimum of 1 mL of whole blood is collected. Aglucose level reading is immediately determined using a glucose meter(ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Plus), which requires approximately one drop of blood.Average % fasting blood glucose levels (% FBGL) from Day 0 to Day 8 areplotted, which allows the bioactivity of a fusion protein to bedetermined. It is expected that the homodimers of SEQ ID NO: 34 and SEQID NO: 36 will lower blood glucose for a significant period of time on asingle dose.

Example 30: In Vivo Immunogenicity Screening after Repeated SubcutaneousDoses of the Feline Insulin-Fc Fusion Proteins of SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ IDNO: 34, and SEQ ID NO: 36

The feline insulin-Fc fusion protein configurations of SEQ ID NO: 32,SEQ ID NO: 34 and SEQ ID NO: 36 are evaluated for in vivo immunogenicityafter repeated subcutaneous doses.

The insulin-Fc fusion protein configurations are manufactured in HEK293cells according to Example 2 and purified using a Protein A columnaccording to Example 4. The structures are confirmed according toExample 6 by non-reducing and reducing CE-SDS, and the sequences arefurther identified by LC-MS with glycan removal according to Example 8.The % homodimers are measured by size-exclusion chromatography accordingto Example 10. The in vivo bioactivity after a single dose of theinsulin-Fc fusion protein configuration being tested is measuredaccording to Example 14 and the in vivo bioactivity is measured afterrepeated doses according to Example 16.

It is expected that the feline insulin-Fc fusion protein configurationof SEQ ID NO: 32 (comprising the Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO: 19) and thefeline insulin-Fc fusion protein configuration of SEQ ID NO: 34(comprising the Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO: 20) will exhibit decreasingbioactivity in vivo after repeated doses. That is, the NAOC and theNAOCR do not maintain an NAOCR greater than 0.6 over at least threedoses. It is further expected that the feline insulin-Fc fusion proteinconfiguration of SEQ ID NO: 36 (comprising the Fc fragment of SEQ ID NO:21 with the asparagine to lysine mutation at the cNg location) willexhibit sustained bioactivity in vivo after repeated doses. That is, theNAOC and the NAOCR do maintain an NAOCR greater than 0.6 over at leastthree doses.

Example 31: Exemplary Insulin-Fc Fusion Protein Domains and Sequences

Exemplary insulin-Fc fusion protein domains and sequences used in theabove Examples are shown in FIG. 4.

EQUIVALENTS

In the claims articles such as “a,” “an,” and “the” may mean one or morethan one unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from thecontext. Claims or descriptions that include “or” between one or moremembers of a group are considered satisfied if one, more than one, orall the group members are present in, employed in, or otherwise relevantto a given product or process unless indicated to the contrary orotherwise evident from the context. The disclosure includes embodimentsin which exactly one member of the group is present in, employed in, orotherwise relevant to a given product or process. The disclosureincludes embodiments in which more than one, or all the group membersare present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product orprocess.

Furthermore, the disclosure encompasses all variations, combinations,and permutations in which one or more limitations, elements, clauses,and descriptive terms from one or more of the listed claims areintroduced into another claim. For example, any claim that is dependenton another claim can be modified to include one or more limitationsfound in any other claim that is dependent on the same base claim. Whereelements are presented as lists, e.g., in Markush group format, eachsubgroup of the elements is also disclosed, and any element(s) can beremoved from the group. In general, where the disclosure, or aspects ofthe disclosure, is/are referred to as comprising elements and/orfeatures, certain embodiments of the disclosure or aspects of thedisclosure consist, or consist essentially of, such elements and/orfeatures. For purposes of simplicity, those embodiments have not beenspecifically set forth in haec verba herein. It is also noted that theterms “comprise(s),” “comprising,” “contain(s),” and “containing” areintended to be open and the use thereof permits the inclusion ofadditional elements or steps. Where ranges are given, endpoints areincluded. Furthermore, unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evidentfrom the context and understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art,values that are expressed as ranges can assume any specific value orsub-range within the stated ranges in different embodiments of thedisclosure, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range,unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

Additional advantages of the various embodiments of the technology willbe apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the disclosureherein and the working examples. It will be appreciated that the variousembodiments described herein are not necessarily mutually exclusiveunless otherwise indicated herein. For example, a feature described ordepicted in one embodiment may also be included in other embodiments,but is not necessarily included. Thus, the present invention encompassesa variety of combinations and/or integrations of the specificembodiments described herein.

The present description also uses numerical ranges to quantify certainparameters relating to various embodiments of the invention. It shouldbe understood that when numerical ranges are provided, such ranges areto be construed as providing literal support for claim limitations thatonly recite the lower value of the range as well as claim limitationsthat only recite the upper value of the range. For example, a disclosednumerical range of about 10 to about 100 provides literal support for aclaim reciting “greater than about 10” (with no upper bounds) and aclaim reciting “less than about 100” (with no lower bounds).

We claim:
 1. A recombinant cell comprising a nucleic acid encoding afusion protein, said fusion protein comprising an insulin polypeptideand an Fc fragment, wherein the insulin polypeptide and the Fc fragmentare connected by a peptide linker, wherein the Fc fragment comprises thefollowing sequence: (SEQ ID NO: 21)GEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEEKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG,

and wherein the insulin polypeptide comprises the following sequence:(SEQ ID NO: 4) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCN.


2. The recombinant cell of claim 1, wherein the cell is a HEK293 cell ora CHO cell.
 3. The recombinant cell of claim 1, wherein said nucleicacid comprises cDNA encoding said fusion protein, said fusion proteincomprising the following sequence: (SEQ ID NO: 36)FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG.


4. The recombinant cell of claim 3, wherein the cDNA comprises thefollowing nucleic acid sequence: (SEQ ID NO: 37)atggaatggagctgggtctttctcttcttcctgtcagtaacgactggtgtccactccttcgtgaaccagcacctgtgcggctccgacctggtggaagctctgtatctcgtgtgcggcgagcggggcttcttctacaccgatcccactggaggcggtccacgcagaggcatcgtggaacagtgctgccactccatctgctccctgtaccagctggaaaactactgcaatggcggaggtggttcaggaggcggtggaggtgagggccccaagtgccccgtgcccgagattcccggtgcccccagcgtgttcatctttcccccaaaacccaaggacaccctgagcatcagcaggacccccgaggtgacctgcctggtggtggacctgggacccgacgacagcaacgtgcagatcacctggttcgtggacaacaccgagatgcacaccgccaagaccaggcctcgggaggagcagttcaagagcacctacagggtggtgagcgtgctgcccatcctgcaccaggactggctgaagggcaaggagttcaagtgcaaggtgaacagcaagagcctgcccagcgccatggagaggaccatcagcaaggccaagggtcagccccacgagccccaagtgtacgtgcttcccccgacccaggaggagttgagcgagaacaaagtgagcgtgacctgcctgatcaagggcttccaccctcccgacatcgccgtggagtgggagatcaccggccagcctgagccggaaaataactaccagaccacccctccacagctggacagcgacggcacctacttcctttacagcaggctgtctgtggaccgaagccattggcaaaggggcaacacctacacctgcagcgtgagccacgaggctctgcacagccaccacacccagaagtctctgacc cagagccccggatag.


5. The recombinant cell of claim 1, wherein said recombinant cell is astably transfected recombinant cell.
 6. A method of preparing arecombinant cell according to claim 1, said method comprising:transfecting a host cell with a nucleic acid encoding for said fusionprotein comprising said insulin polypeptide and said Fc fragmentconnected by said linker, wherein said fusion protein is expressed insaid recombinant cell after said transfecting step.
 7. The method ofclaim 6, further comprising: culturing said recombinant cell in cellculture media; and harvesting cell culture supernatant from said cellculture media, said cell culture supernatant comprising said expressedfusion protein.
 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: recoveringsaid fusion protein from said cell culture supernatant.
 9. The method ofclaim 8, wherein said recovering step comprises one or more steps ofcentrifugation, filtration, or chromatography.
 10. The method of claim6, wherein said transfecting step comprises stable transfection of saidhost cell.
 11. The method of claim 6, wherein said nucleic acidcomprises cDNA encoding said fusion protein, said fusion proteincomprising the following sequence: (SEQ ID NO: 36)FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHT QKSLTQSPG.


12. The method of claim 11, wherein the cDNA comprises the followingnucleic acid sequence: (SEQ ID NO: 37)atggaatggagctgggtctttctcttcttcctgtcagtaacgactggtgtccactccttcgtgaaccagcacctgtgcggctccgacctggtggaagctctgtatctcgtgtgcggcgagcggggcttcttctacaccgatcccactggaggcggtccacgcagaggcatcgtggaacagtgctgccactccatctgctccctgtaccagctggaaaactactgcaatggcggaggtggttcaggaggcggtggaggtgagggccccaagtgccccgtgcccgagattcccggtgcccccagcgtgttcatctttcccccaaaacccaaggacaccctgagcatcagcaggacccccgaggtgacctgcctggtggtggacctgggacccgacgacagcaacgtgcagatcacctggttcgtggacaacaccgagatgcacaccgccaagaccaggcctcgggaggagcagttcaagagcacctacagggtggtgagcgtgctgcccatcctgcaccaggactggctgaagggcaaggagttcaagtgcaaggtgaacagcaagagcctgcccagcgccatggagaggaccatcagcaaggccaagggtcagccccacgagccccaagtgtacgtgcttcccccgacccaggaggagttgagcgagaacaaagtgagcgtgacctgcctgatcaagggcttccaccctcccgacatcgccgtggagtgggagatcaccggccagcctgagccggaaaataactaccagaccacccctccacagctggacagcgacggcacctacttcctttacagcaggctgtctgtggaccgaagccattggcaaaggggcaacacctacacctgcagcgtgagccacgaggctctgcacagccaccacacccagaagtctctgacc cagagccccggatag.


13. A cDNA encoding a fusion protein comprising the following sequence:(SEQ ID NO: 36) FVNQHLCGSDLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTDPTGGGPRRGIVEQCCHSICSLYQLENYCNGGGGSGGGGGEGPKCPVPEIPGAPSVFIFPPKPKDTLSISRTPEVTCLVVDLGPDDSNVQITWFVDNTEMHTAKTRPREEQFKSTYRVVSVLPILHQDWLKGKEFKCKVNSKSLPSAMERTISKAKGQPHEPQVYVLPPTQEELSENKVSVTCLIKGFHPPDIAVEWEITGQPEPENNYQTTPPQLDSDGTYFLYSRLSVDRSHWQRGNTYTCSVSHEALHSHHTQKSLTQSPG.


14. The cDNA of claim 13, wherein the cDNA comprises the followingnucleic acid sequence: (SEQ ID NO: 37)atggaatggagctgggtctttctcttcttcctgtcagtaacgactggtgtccactccttcgtgaaccagcacctgtgcggctccgacctggtggaagctctgtatctcgtgtgcggcgagcggggcttcttctacaccgatcccactggaggcggtccacgcagaggcatcgtggaacagtgctgccactccatctgctccctgtaccagctggaaaactactgcaatggcggaggtggttcaggaggcggtggaggtgagggccccaagtgccccgtgcccgagattcccggtgcccccagcgtgttcatctttcccccaaaacccaaggacaccctgagcatcagcaggacccccgaggtgacctgcctggtggtggacctgggacccgacgacagcaacgtgcagatcacctggttcgtggacaacaccgagatgcacaccgccaagaccaggcctcgggaggagcagttcaagagcacctacagggtggtgagcgtgctgcccatcctgcaccaggactggctgaagggcaaggagttcaagtgcaaggtgaacagcaagagcctgcccagcgccatggagaggaccatcagcaaggccaagggtcagccccacgagccccaagtgtacgtgcttcccccgacccaggaggagttgagcgagaacaaagtgagcgtgacctgcctgatcaagggcttccaccctcccgacatcgccgtggagtgggagatcaccggccagcctgagccggaaaataactaccagaccacccctccacagctggacagcgacggcacctacttcctttacagcaggctgtctgtggaccgaagccattggcaaaggggcaacacctacacctgcagcgtgagccacgaggctctgcacagccaccacacccagaagtctctgacc cagagccccggatag.